Categories Politics

7 days 30 days All time Recent Popular
Here's a politician telling you the truth. The Omnibus Bill is a pork-laden collection of wasteful spending that may not stand scrutiny on their own. Collectively, politicians look the other way so long as everyone gets a seat on the Omni-bus.


Don't blindly celebrate politicians "bringing home the bacon" because your $4 million project just cost Taxpayers $2.3 trillion. A bank wouldn't give credit to any of us who handled money like our government does.

Your taxes don't go up simply because we needed Covid relief. They go up because 435 lawmakers have to impress you with how much they can add to our debt of our great grandkids. As a nation, we don't actually have any of this money. Neither party cares.

#COVID19 #omnibusbill

We have to pay more attention. The credit card payment will come due at some point and there are not enough rich people to tax.

Finally, for now, don't you think it's odd that the leaders of these parties have been doing their jobs for 20-30 years and we keep having to get to Christmas deadlines to pass large, unread legislation? That's not a design flaw, it's a feature! They're playing all of us.
Beyond disappointment in @johnfocook and his @skepticscience. It has become another scientology church.

Maybe @ggreenwald will want to make a paper on this:

> **How the imperialist mindset/narrative is infesting the scientific fields.**

//next


What @skepticscience posted on their FB page
>
https://t.co/NXMG74TVhm

My instantaneously censored comment + blocking me for being able to comment on their page.
> //next tweet

"You mean the team of Biden ?
The oligarch team who's as dirty as Trump's team ?
The same Biden who has relentlessly hunted Snowden under Obama and forced both Snowden and Greenwald into exile?
Sure!
//next

I used to appreciate reading "Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists" and "Skeptical Science". Now you both are deep in political platitudes.
Your rationals are completely outdated.
//next

You should educate yourself and guess better on the future of climate under neoliberalism (be it nationalist or globalist) IF the issue really concerns
I'm excited to help #waleg build back better today.

Rep. @wickse's HB 1329 is exactly how.

While #idleg Rep @MeganBlanksma work to silence #healthcareheroes public health boards, we're working to let more voices be heard. That's building back better. That's leadership for you.


Here is how we #buildbackbetter... @wickse HB 1329 will:

a) Allow public comment, including an online component regardless if the meeting is in-person or online

b) Require recordings be retained of public meetings

c) Put in minutes why an executive session to exclude ze public


Watch us today. 🇺🇸

@TVWnews link:
https://t.co/WBNULbIkR9

Three bills on deck today... so might be a while before HB 1329. Will live-tweet out ze action as able.

But we will have a real hearing with real testimony & real sunlight as we work to build back better.


We also have HB 1180, a weak @WaHouseGOP #opengov bill with a lot of testimony to come also. Bill doesn't go far enough as I'll explain. Basically no online public comment option.


But enough about weak bills. HB 1180 won't go anywhere.

More worried about the concern trolling to amend and likely weaken HB 1329. #waleg has way too many lobbyists who don't work for the people but for the government bench as you can see below.
There was a time when @RichLowry writing something this nakedly despicable would have been unthinkable. Accusing a man of helping provoke a crime via something he wrote FOUR YEARS BEFOREHAND is the kind of ethics you want Buckley's life's work to be associated with, Rich? Really?


Beyond that stunning abandonment of conscience, @RichLowry naturally neglects to include a link to the Flight 93 Election essay, because when you're lying about something it's better the readers you're trying to deceive not have the original on hand for quick comparison.

Here is that link, where you will find that, contrary to @RichLowry's journalistic malpractice, Anton does not "valorize" Trump's flaws, argue that Trump is a "savior," or suggest that "character and norms no longer

If you don't have time for the the full essay right now, at least read the following passages and ask yourself how well they match @RichLowry's misrepresentations:


There is a strong case to be made for the Flight 93 Election essay being the single most impactful piece of political writing of the decade. I can think of no other work that has provoked so many responses, over so long, of so much anger and yet so little substance.