No, Biden hasn't won yet — one more nightmare scenario

Most likely, Biden is our next president, but we could be in for a very rough ride between now and Jan. 20."
"And, @RealRLimbaugh broke it down on Dec 16 - "they do not have as many delegations as the Republicans do. So voting by delegation the Republicans would then control the House and any vote there
It is NOT unprecedented for the electoral count to be challenged, Dems did in 2916.
It is fascinating.

"So under this “endgame maneuver … The Senate, claiming that there is no Electoral College result, picks Pence,” as the vice president. “Overturning an election? Why not?"
https://t.co/DTEPRVtJ68
"The new House, narrowly Democratic, will vote down any challenge. But the Senate? Something very different could occur,” because the Republicans… We don’t know yet, but they are still gonna control the Senate on this date. So, let’s play," @RealRLimbaugh
“The Ds will say the whole process was illegal and unconstitutional, and that the next in line is therefore … Pelosi. Stalemate.” This would be the stalemate of all stalemates. “An empty presidency at noon on Jan. 20..."
"But they do not have as many delegations as the Republicans do. So voting by delegation the Republicans would then control the House and any vote there. But this countertheory says that the tiebreaker would go to the governor," @RealRLimbaugh
"At any rate, this is how you could end up with @realDonaldTrump being reelected president by the House of Reps. That’s why the story, McConnell, Thune warn Senate GOP, please don’t object to any of the Electoral College results on Jan 6th. Why would they issue this warning?"
So typo correction: It is NOT unprecedented for the electoral count to be challenged, Dems did in 2016
"Now, if you think it’s unprecedented let me remind you that 11 times the Democrats challenged the 2016 electoral vote count," @RealRLimbaugh

More from Politics

We’ve been getting calls and outreach from Queens residents all day about this.

The community’s response? Outrage.


Amazon is a billion-dollar company. The idea that it will receive hundreds of millions of dollars in tax breaks at a time when our subway is crumbling and our communities need MORE investment, not less, is extremely concerning to residents here.

When we talk about bringing jobs to the community, we need to dig deep:
- Has the company promised to hire in the existing community?
- What’s the quality of jobs + how many are promised? Are these jobs low-wage or high wage? Are there benefits? Can people collectively bargain?

Displacement is not community development. Investing in luxury condos is not the same thing as investing in people and families.

Shuffling working class people out of a community does not improve their quality of life.

We need to focus on good healthcare, living wages, affordable rent. Corporations that offer none of those things should be met w/ skepticism.

It’s possible to establish economic partnerships w/ real opportunities for working families, instead of a race-to-the-bottom competition.

You May Also Like