No, Biden hasn't won yet — one more nightmare scenario

Most likely, Biden is our next president, but we could be in for a very rough ride between now and Jan. 20."
"And, @RealRLimbaugh broke it down on Dec 16 - "they do not have as many delegations as the Republicans do. So voting by delegation the Republicans would then control the House and any vote there
It is NOT unprecedented for the electoral count to be challenged, Dems did in 2916.
It is fascinating.

"So under this “endgame maneuver … The Senate, claiming that there is no Electoral College result, picks Pence,” as the vice president. “Overturning an election? Why not?"
https://t.co/DTEPRVtJ68
"The new House, narrowly Democratic, will vote down any challenge. But the Senate? Something very different could occur,” because the Republicans… We don’t know yet, but they are still gonna control the Senate on this date. So, let’s play," @RealRLimbaugh
“The Ds will say the whole process was illegal and unconstitutional, and that the next in line is therefore … Pelosi. Stalemate.” This would be the stalemate of all stalemates. “An empty presidency at noon on Jan. 20..."
"But they do not have as many delegations as the Republicans do. So voting by delegation the Republicans would then control the House and any vote there. But this countertheory says that the tiebreaker would go to the governor," @RealRLimbaugh
"At any rate, this is how you could end up with @realDonaldTrump being reelected president by the House of Reps. That’s why the story, McConnell, Thune warn Senate GOP, please don’t object to any of the Electoral College results on Jan 6th. Why would they issue this warning?"
So typo correction: It is NOT unprecedented for the electoral count to be challenged, Dems did in 2016
"Now, if you think it’s unprecedented let me remind you that 11 times the Democrats challenged the 2016 electoral vote count," @RealRLimbaugh

More from Politics

I told you they’d bring this up


I was wondering why that tweet had so many stupid replies. And now I see


Seriously, this was “the night before.” If you’re at the march where they’re changing “Jews will not replace us” and “Blood and soil,” you’re not a “very fine person.” Full stop.


There are 3 important moments in that transcript.

1.) When someone asked Trump about a statement *he had already made* about there being blame on “both sides,” he said the “fine people” line.


2. Trump does clarify! “I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and white nationalists — because they should be condemned totally “

Okay!

Then adds that there were “many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists.”

You May Also Like

Great article from @AsheSchow. I lived thru the 'Satanic Panic' of the 1980's/early 1990's asking myself "Has eveyrbody lost their GODDAMN MINDS?!"


The 3 big things that made the 1980's/early 1990's surreal for me.

1) Satanic Panic - satanism in the day cares ahhhh!

2) "Repressed memory" syndrome

3) Facilitated Communication [FC]

All 3 led to massive abuse.

"Therapists" -and I use the term to describe these quacks loosely - would hypnotize people & convince they they were 'reliving' past memories of Mom & Dad killing babies in Satanic rituals in the basement while they were growing up.

Other 'therapists' would badger kids until they invented stories about watching alligators eat babies dropped into a lake from a hot air balloon. Kids would deny anything happened for hours until the therapist 'broke through' and 'found' the 'truth'.

FC was a movement that started with the claim severely handicapped individuals were able to 'type' legible sentences & communicate if a 'helper' guided their hands over a keyboard.