Thread – Election Fraud Denial and Course of Action

1. There was massive election fraud during the election. You know it, I know it, and everyone with a functional brain knows it – even those in the Democrat-media complex who want to wish it away & usher in the Biden Dark Ages.

2. There was an excellent article at American Thinker yesterday that examined possible reasons why an intelligent observer would opt for the cover-up of election fraud if it did take place:
https://t.co/Hth3IxoY3w
3. Here are the reasons listed:

3A. Reason 1: The election fraud–denier wanted President Trump to be removed from the Oval Office.

3B. Reason 2: The election fraud denier-wanted a Democrat to be elected as the president.
3C. Reason 3: The election fraud–denier was afraid of violence that investigation of election fraud may lead to.

3D. Reason 4: The election fraud–denier wants to be "pragmatic" — that is, to accept whatever happened and go along with whatever comes out of it.
3E. Reason 5: The election-fraud denier was concerned that any serious investigation of election fraud might erode public trust in our elections.
4. A current reigning theory on what may happen on 6 January based on the thin reed of the 12th Amendment is that VP Pence will be in the hot seat and required to make a choice on which way the presidential election goes.
5. Door #1 would be Pence throwing down the gauntlet, disqualify Biden’s electors in contested states, and substitute President Trump’s electors. That would take some serious courage because the Left/Democrats would come unglued.
6. Door #2 would be Pence rolling over and ignoring the election fraud in the interests of ostensibly avoiding the bloodshed that would ensue if he opened Door #1. I believe the assumptions associated with Door #2 (and Reason #3 above) to be false.
7. If Pence (on behalf of the political class) takes the path of avoiding an investigation into the election fraud to foster false safety and tranquility (Door #2), this will only ensure much worse violence once the fighting starts ….
7A. … because there are a lot of people who won’t take the “hologram” (the perfect analogy for Biden supplied by a friend) in the Oval Office lying down.
8. To take down the fraudsters can bring about a backlash of rioting from the Left. So what?
9. That rioting and associated violence will, in the rearview mirror, be a minor bump in the road compared to the terrible consequences of the civil militia standing up and setting the USA back on course as a legitimate Republic.
10. Get the correction done now and deal with the left's idiot street minions or do a full-up rebellion later in order to get things back on course. At this point, I am tired of the kicking the can down the road and do not care. I only want sooner than later.
11. From the Cold War until now, it seems all of my adult life has been the one big loop back to dealing with communists (globalists, aristocracy, whatever) one way or another.
12. That wheel has gone around, and I for one am pretty much done with the enemies of mankind and enemies of our goal of peace for everyone - socialists, commies, anarchists, global aristocracy, islamofascists, etc.
13. I don't expect to see the end of it, but WTF! Let's (finally - at least in the USA) get it done. If a depression or a virus can ripple around the world, maybe freedom can, too (finally). Perhaps my grandkids could live to see freedom AND peace.
14. All I know is that the road to peace is paved with dead enemies of freedom, and we do not get to the end of the road without paying the price and building the pyres.
15. Is the 7 years of tribulations predicted in the Book of Revelations coming? Because it sure looks biblical these days to me. Seven years of world war to gain a thousand years of peace? Seems like a deal to me.
16. I now return to my re-reading of the Left Behind series. I am on “The Remnant”…. ///The end.

More from Stop the Steal - Stu Cvrk

More from Politics

My piece in the NY Times today: "the Trump administration is denying applications submitted to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services at a rate 37 percent higher than the Obama administration did in 2016."

Based on this analysis: "Denials for immigration benefits—travel documents, work permits, green cards, worker petitions, etc.—increased 37 percent since FY 2016. On an absolute basis, FY 2018 will see more than about 155,000 more denials than FY 2016."
https://t.co/Bl0naOO0sh


"This increase in denials cannot be credited to an overall rise in applications. In fact, the total number of applications so far this year is 2 percent lower than in 2016. It could be that the higher denial rate is also discouraging some people from applying at all.."

Thanks to @gsiskind for his insightful comments. The increase in denials, he said, is “significant enough to make one think that Congress must have passed legislation changing the requirements. But we know they have not.”

My conclusion:

You May Also Like

A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.

Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.

6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices

https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x


PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.

735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices

https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ


The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.

The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.