Supreme Court will hear today a petition filed by Facebook India Vice-President, Ajit Mohan, which challenges the summons issued to him by Delhi Assembly's Committee of Peace and Harmony in relation to #DelhiRiots2020.

@FacebookIndia @secondatticus #Facebook

In the previous hearing, Senior Advocate Harish Salv, appearing for Ajit Mohan, asserted before the Supreme Court that Mohan would not appear before the Committee of Peace and Harmony of the Delhi Legislative.

@secondatticus #Facebook
Facebook Only Gives A Platform; Its Vice President Will Not Appear Before Delhi Assembly Panel: Salve Tells SC

https://t.co/TmvueDaJE3
Assembly Panel on Peace and Harmony is looking into complaints on the "role or complicity of Facebook officials in the Delhi riots" that took place in February 2020.

Mohan was issued two summons on August 31, 2020 and the second, on September 18, 2020.

@secondatticus #Facebook
A Bench of Justices SK Kaul, Dinesh Maheshwari and Hrishikesh Roy will be presiding over the matter.

#Facebook @secondatticus @raghav_chadha #DelhiRiots @DrAMSinghvi
Justice Kaul states that Item 14 will be taken up now and then the Bench will break.

Item 13 will be taken up after that.

#Facebook @secondatticus @raghav_chadha #DelhiRiots @DrAMSinghvi
Matter commences.

#Facebook @secondatticus @raghav_chadha #DelhiRiots @DrAMSinghvi
Bench will reassemble. Senior Advocates Harish Salve, Dr. AM Singhvi, Rajeev Dhavan are present.

#Facebook @secondatticus @raghav_chadha #DelhiRiots @DrAMSinghvi
Dhavan: We have filed an Intervention and it’s on behalf of the Committee whose actions have been impugned through its Chairperson. I have prepared the submissions.

#Facebook @secondatticus @raghav_chadha #DelhiRiots @DrAMSinghvi
Dhavan: I’ll be sending it to the Registry. This issue concerns powers of the Committee.

Bench: This has been sent to others ?

Dhavan: It’s been filed.

#Facebook @secondatticus @raghav_chadha #DelhiRiots @DrAMSinghvi
Bench: We will have to issue notice and see what others have to say.

Dhavan: Will Mr. Salve have any problem ?

Salve: It is always a pleasure to hear. Dr. Dhavan. But, they are saying that Committee has separate powers as a jurisdictional entity.

#Facebook @secondatticus
Salve: We have a lot to say about his stand. We don’t have it in writing so far. You may allow this Application, subject to conditions. These are all legal issues ultimately.

#Facebook @secondatticus @raghav_chadha #DelhiRiots @DrAMSinghvi
Bench: Issues have been raised about the status of the Committee.

Salve states that notice can be issued.

Dhavan: If Salve says that question of law is involved, then it can be answered during the proceedings. I don’t want that to be held up.
Bench: How much time do you want to file Reply ?

Salve: I have American clients, and I want to play it safe. So, I would request for 4 weeks.

Bench: That’s too much.

#Facebook @secondatticus @raghav_chadha #DelhiRiots @DrAMSinghvi
Singhvi: If Salve feels it’s an issue of law, then I would suggest for the proceedings to continue. Otherwise, the earliest date.

#Facebook @secondatticus @raghav_chadha #DelhiRiots @DrAMSinghvi
Dhavan suggests that he is ready to hear Salve on any point against him. He is merely resisting the possibility of a further date when the Intervention is allowed.

#Facebook @secondatticus @raghav_chadha #DelhiRiots @DrAMSinghvi
Dhavan: If Salve says that it may be allowed.

Salve: The Bench may fix a date for final hearing and I will take my instructions.

#Facebook @secondatticus @raghav_chadha #DelhiRiots @DrAMSinghvi
Bench issues notice in the Application and gives two weeks to Petitioner to file a Reply. Applicant has been directed to file a written synopsis. Further, the Application will be listed along with the main matter.

#Facebook @secondatticus @raghav_chadha #DelhiRiots @DrAMSinghvi
Discussion ensues on the possible date for listing of matter.

Bench decides to list the matter in the third week of January, on a regular day, except for 19th January, 2021.

#Facebook @secondatticus @raghav_chadha #DelhiRiots @DrAMSinghvi
Justice Kaul remarks: I thought this matter would take the whole day.

Justice Roy: Yes, because earlier they all wanted 3 hours each!

#Facebook @secondatticus @raghav_chadha #DelhiRiots @DrAMSinghvi

More from Live Law

More from Politics

What does "patriots in control" mean?
What would that "look like" in reality?


So a massive adult film star in all his glory is included in an official FBI government filing


Hunter Biden's book is categorized as "Chinese


TIME admits to "conspiracy" to "not rig, rather


A "pillow guy" has military-grade intercepts detailing the IP addresses and device MAC IDs of EVERY incursion into every county in the
"3 million people are estimated not to have official photo ID, with ethnic minorities more at risk". They will "have to contact their council to confirm their ID if they want to vote"

This is shameful legislation, that does nothing to tackle the problems with UK elections.THREAD


There is no evidence in-person voter fraud is a problem, and it wd be near-impossible to organise on an effective scale. Campaign finance violations, digital disinformation & manipulation of postal voting are bigger issues, but these are crimes of the powerful, not the powerless.

In a democracy, anything that makes it harder to vote - in particular, anything that disadvantages one group of voters - should face an extremely high bar. Compulsory voter ID takes a hammer to 3 million legitimate voters (disproportionately poor & BAME) to crack an imaginary nut

If the government is concerned about the purity of elections, it should reflect on its own conduct. In 2019 it circulated doctored news footage of an opponent, disguised its twitter feed as a fake fact-checking site, and ran adverts so dishonest that even Facebook took them down.

Britain's electoral law largely predates the internet. There is little serious regulation of online campaigning or the cash that pays for it. That allows unscrupulous campaigners to ignore much of the legal framework erected since the C19th to guard against electoral misconduct.

You May Also Like

A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.

Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.

6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices

https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x


PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.

735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices

https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ


The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.

The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.