for positional straddle - i prefer monthly expiry [because of higher premium and comfortable to manage monthly options]
for positional strangle/IC - i prefer weekly expiry [as it is easy to get 15 points every week then getting 60 points in whole month]
views are welcome..
More from yogesh nanda
Youtube channel:
https://t.co/Tn5s5tQucn
Telegram Group:
https://t.co/zcMFYLuFUU
1. Option Buying setup video [English]:
https://t.co/oCuI7ryOVS
2. Option Buying setup video [Hindi]:
https://t.co/GEtwvPipih
[1/3] @jitendrajain
3. learn Position Sizing:
https://t.co/mjGwmms21Y
4. overcome late OI signal:
https://t.co/rULPzfNpId
5. Gamma impact
https://t.co/6r9wKx3ewC
6. Risk Management
7. 4 part video on optimisation of various aspect:
a https://t.co/G7FDAm9VEg
b https://t.co/KjkzlbDBeR
c https://t.co/Vcn5icNO9P
d https://t.co/SsggfnwPNZ
8. examples
a https://t.co/S9OB41tNxx
b https://t.co/xZeKvZq3Uo
c https://t.co/mgQVYJu8te
d
Subscribe to channel:
https://t.co/pzyd1ju3i9
1. Basics of Option Greeks
https://t.co/zCgZOYfh38
2. Basics of Open Interest [futures]
https://t.co/gBEA7rouxV
3. Option buying full
4. Data Analysis in Excel
https://t.co/yhWjhdbOMG
5. Understand Gamma Risk
https://t.co/DVhOBGPM19
6. Option buying setup - strike selection
https://t.co/mgQVYJu8te
7. Yogeeswar Pal live trading
https://t.co/mtIJU5VYUl
@jitendrajain @yogeeswarpal
More from Optionslearnings
How many are believing only in simple trading system?
— Mitesh Patel (@Mitesh_Engr) April 3, 2021
This is my simple trading.
I don\u2019t have any magic.
— Mitesh Patel (@Mitesh_Engr) January 7, 2021
Next week I will prefer to sell put in between strike 30500-31000 as shown in pic. Will manage upto 31000.
If breaks 31000 as first down support then will exit put nearby 31000 strike and will sell
31500 call ( will act as resistance again )
Simple hai na pic.twitter.com/hPLIMq3tSe
Many people were asking us in the comments, how we managed.
Explained transparently what we did.
Hope you get something to learn from this. 😀👍
Sep 23, 2021 - Weekly expiry, preceded by the FOMC meet and not to mention the gap up which then turned out to be a trending day
— Nikita Poojary (@niki_poojary) September 25, 2021
Here\u2019s how the strangles were converted into straddles & how the positions were managed!
Time for a Thread \U0001f9f5
You May Also Like
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.