hind copper
trying to form leg D
seems like had created a small base at 135 levels
can give a good run up
one can add here at 154 for 183 - 192
keeping sl 133 clbs
More from Vibhor Varshney
KEI industries
Another BO
Another rocket
🔥🔥
This is how you trade with price action
Trade with conviction 👍👍
Hits lifetime high
750+ 🔥
600 to 750+
Booking 50% positions here and holding rest for 790 - 844 with cost as trailing SL
Another BO
Another rocket
🔥🔥
This is how you trade with price action
Trade with conviction 👍👍
Hits lifetime high
750+ 🔥
600 to 750+
Booking 50% positions here and holding rest for 790 - 844 with cost as trailing SL
Kei industries
— Vibhor Varshney (@nakulvibhor) June 16, 2021
Hits first target
Chart posted \u2714\ufe0f
Level posted \u2714\ufe0f\u2714\ufe0f
600 to 700+
Booking 40%positions here
Holding rest for 790-844
\U0001f44d https://t.co/fyAX9xGI2V
Screeners
Save this post for future reference as well
technical screeners - intraday and positional both
positional one
run - find #stock - draw chart - find levels
1- Stocks closing daily 2% up from 5 days
https://t.co/gTZrYY3Nht
2- Weekly breakout
https://t.co/1f4ahEolYB
3- Breakouts in short term
https://t.co/BI4h0CdgO2
4- Bullish from last 5
intraday screeners
5- 15 minute Stock Breakouts
https://t.co/9eAo82iuNv
6- Intraday Buying seen in the past 15 minutes
https://t.co/XqAJKhLB5G
7- Stocks trading near day's high on 5 min chart with volume BO intraday
https://t.co/flHmm6QXmo
Happy Trading ❤️❤️
Save this post for future reference as well
technical screeners - intraday and positional both
positional one
run - find #stock - draw chart - find levels
1- Stocks closing daily 2% up from 5 days
https://t.co/gTZrYY3Nht
2- Weekly breakout
https://t.co/1f4ahEolYB
3- Breakouts in short term
https://t.co/BI4h0CdgO2
4- Bullish from last 5
intraday screeners
5- 15 minute Stock Breakouts
https://t.co/9eAo82iuNv
6- Intraday Buying seen in the past 15 minutes
https://t.co/XqAJKhLB5G
7- Stocks trading near day's high on 5 min chart with volume BO intraday
https://t.co/flHmm6QXmo
Happy Trading ❤️❤️
More from Nishhindcopper
Will post charts of next potential movers tomorrow. Interested?
#Dare2Drm
#HindCopper Stock is coming out of a big consolidation. A move above 147, stock could be headed to 165 (next resistance). If #BseMetals index breaks out, i am expecting levels of 196 again and if that gets taken out, levels of 220. lets see - one step at a time
#Dare2Drm
#Dare2Drm
Will post charts of next potential movers tomorrow. Interested.#Dare2Drm
— Dare2Dream (@Dare2Dr10109801) July 9, 2021
#HindCopper Stock is coming out of a big consolidation. A move above 147, stock could be headed to 165 (next resistance). If #BseMetals index breaks out, i am expecting levels of 196 again and if that gets taken out, levels of 220. lets see - one step at a time
#Dare2Drm
Hindcopper cmp146+
Previous low 135 can be the SL for longs.
Possible short term bottom here CONFIRMATION ABOVE 158 for further upside
Previous low 135 can be the SL for longs.
Possible short term bottom here CONFIRMATION ABOVE 158 for further upside
Hindcopper -- Expect Buying interest once price cross/close above 157-158 zone pic.twitter.com/GfRd1yHFpH
— Shivaji Vitthalrao\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@shivaji_1983) July 5, 2021
You May Also Like
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?