More from Shubham Mishra🇮🇳⚡

More from Niftylongterm

Well, alarms were sound.
₹Nifty > #Nifty


Explanation for the alarm that sounded. Textbook short term top.
Clean technicals.
₹Nifty > #Nifty


Is Nifty gunning for an ultimate double zig-zag shake out towards 17k which would coincide with weekly 20 EMA and 100 DEMA tag? Fair possibility. Only time will tell. Watch for the break of 50 DEMA and support zone.
₹Nifty > #Nifty

@piyushchaudhry


If Nifty breaks 50 DEMA and closes below 17700. 17220-17150-17000 possible. Worst case scenario is ~17000. Lot of confluence support in that range.
Do your DD.
₹Nifty > #Nifty


Nifty’s daily looks like ABC is done, but internals suggests that it still needs a final sell off to make a bottom for WXY. A bull trap towards 17735-17810 can’t be ruled out before the final sell off.
Just analysis, reserve the right to be wrong.
₹Nifty > #Nifty
#repost

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?