Setting the record straight for the dishonest media, far left actors and the grifting right, please feel free to share this post on their fake news threads:

1. This is NOT Nick Fuentes. Nick was not inside the Capitol building nor Nancy Pelosi’s office

2. Nick was wearing a suit the entire time.

3. Nick has never called for the killing of any state legislators during his show.

These are all mass lies and disinformation being put out there to slander his good name, get him deplatformed and perhaps try to get LEO’s to visit
We take all misinformation and slander very seriously. It’s one thing for a casual troll but it’s another when you threatened the ability of one to earn a living and to incriminate an innocent man. It’s disgusting and everyone involved should be ashamed.
We are looking to means to hold these actors accountable for their slanderous, and dangerous actions.
@haaretzcom https://t.co/ESW2YPf0UG

This article is false and misleading. Nick was not in the capitol in Nancy Pelosi's office.

Remove this falsehood immediately.

https://t.co/D4SbuKDhmd
Here is video proof that not only were Nick and others not at the capitol building but they were not even close

https://t.co/g3ZcX9UFbR
@davenewworld_2 this is fake, retract and apologize for your intentionally misleading and defaming statements.

https://t.co/C3qGTp5cWA
@nathanTbernard this is fake, retract and apologize for your intentionally misleading and defaming statements.

https://t.co/rLtJyrhSSF
@HunterAA6 this is fake, retract and apologize for your intentionally misleading and defaming statements.

https://t.co/lmynkiDDyv
@merrickdeville this is fake, retract and apologize for your intentionally misleading and defaming statements.

https://t.co/LtDmtAHfwU

More from News

1/1 On @seanhannity last night (at 5:56 of this clip), @SenTedCruz said that the Hayes-Tilden Commission was "charged with reviewing the evidence and making a determination about the disputed ballots." That's incorrect. The Commission was tasked with determining which rival ...


2/2 ... group of electors was appointed by the authority within state government entitled to make that appointment at the time the electors cast their votes on the constitutionally required day. Justice Joseph Bradley, who was held the intentionally tiebreaking seat on the ...

3/3 ... 15-member Commission, explained his decision in favor of Hayes by saying that it was NOT the Commission's authority (NOR Congress's, from which the Commission derived its subsidiary power) to determine whether the state properly counted its popular vote. Instead, ...

4/4 ...it was the Commission's job to figure out which of the competing claims was correct concerning who had authority under state law to make the determination upon which the appointment of electors would be based. For Florida, Bradley ruled that the state's canvassing board...

5/5... had this authority at the time the electors voted & thus Congress was obligated to accept the votes cast by the electors that the canvassing board had appointed, and this was true even if the canvassing board's appointment was based on a mistake or even fraud affecting ...

You May Also Like

🌿𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝒔𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒚 𝒐𝒇 𝒂 𝑺𝒕𝒂𝒓 : 𝑫𝒉𝒓𝒖𝒗𝒂 & 𝑽𝒊𝒔𝒉𝒏𝒖

Once upon a time there was a Raja named Uttānapāda born of Svayambhuva Manu,1st man on earth.He had 2 beautiful wives - Suniti & Suruchi & two sons were born of them Dhruva & Uttama respectively.
#talesofkrishna https://t.co/E85MTPkF9W


Now Suniti was the daughter of a tribal chief while Suruchi was the daughter of a rich king. Hence Suruchi was always favored the most by Raja while Suniti was ignored. But while Suniti was gentle & kind hearted by nature Suruchi was venomous inside.
#KrishnaLeela


The story is of a time when ideally the eldest son of the king becomes the heir to the throne. Hence the sinhasan of the Raja belonged to Dhruva.This is why Suruchi who was the 2nd wife nourished poison in her heart for Dhruva as she knew her son will never get the throne.


One day when Dhruva was just 5 years old he went on to sit on his father's lap. Suruchi, the jealous queen, got enraged and shoved him away from Raja as she never wanted Raja to shower Dhruva with his fatherly affection.


Dhruva protested questioning his step mother "why can't i sit on my own father's lap?" A furious Suruchi berated him saying "only God can allow him that privilege. Go ask him"