January 1:
THE MINIMALISTS: LESS IS NOW
January 6:
RATONES PARANOICOS: THE BAND THAT ROCKED ARGENTINA
TONY PARKER: THE FINAL SHOT
January 7:
PIECES OF A WOMAN
January 8:
CHARMING
STUCK APART (AZIZLER)
Here’s every movie coming to Netflix in January (thread):
January 1:
THE MINIMALISTS: LESS IS NOW
January 6:
RATONES PARANOICOS: THE BAND THAT ROCKED ARGENTINA
TONY PARKER: THE FINAL SHOT
January 7:
PIECES OF A WOMAN
January 8:
CHARMING
STUCK APART (AZIZLER)
January 11:
CRACK: COCAINE, CORRUPTION & CONSPIRACY
January 14:
THE HEARTBREAK CLUB
January 15:
OUTSIDE THE WIRE
DOUBLE DAD (PAI EM DOBRO)
January 22:
THE WHITE TIGER
SO MY GRANDMA’S A LESBIAN! (SALIR DEL ROPERO)
January 27:
PENGUIN BLOOM
January 29:
FINDING 'OHANA
THE DIG
BELOW ZERO (BAJOCERO)
You May Also Like
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
