Remember probability of all stocks going against you by 10% is very very less.
More from Mitesh Patel
I already shared in my old tweets and I don’t want to repeat same.
Read my old learning tweets in this PDF collection.
Mitesh Bhai's tweets comprises of the live case studies. Study & apply them in your trading system.
— (DJ)itrade capital solution Private Limited. (@ITRADE191) June 25, 2021
Thanks to those who have made the pdfs of Mitesh Bhai's tweets, have merged it in this single pdf.\U0001f607\U0001f60e\U0001f607https://t.co/RLGACDY6sj
Future trading I am recommending to only those who have at least 25L capital to control risk management.
If less capital then do with cash or option writing.
Boss is always Boss @Mitesh_Engr
— Aditya Todmal (@AdityaTodmal) July 31, 2021
Mitesh Sir's FUTURES BREAKOUT TRADES 101:
\u2022 How to pick stocks at right time?
\u2022 What to look for?
\u2022 Importance of BO post consolidation
\u2022 How to manage SL
\u2022 How to get huge profits
\u2022 Multiple Examples
In collaboration with @niki_poojary pic.twitter.com/7uXRgsLgtN
More from Mplearnings
You May Also Like
RT-PCR corona (test) scam
Symptomatic people are tested for one and only one respiratory virus. This means that other acute respiratory infections are reclassified as
4/10
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) October 22, 2020
...indication, first of all that testing for a (single) respiratory virus is done outside of surveillance systems or need for specific therapy, but even so the lack of consideration of Ct, symptoms and clinical findings when interpreting its result. https://t.co/gHH6kwRdZG
2/12
It is tested exquisitely with a hypersensitive non-specific RT-PCR test / Ct >35 (>30 is nonsense, >35 is madness), without considering Ct and clinical context. This means that more acute respiratory infections are reclassified as
6/10
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) October 22, 2020
The neither validated nor standardised hypersensitive RT-PCR test / Ct 35-45 for SARS-CoV-2 is abused to mislabel (also) other diseases, especially influenza, as COVID-19.https://t.co/AkFIfTCTkS
3/12
The Drosten RT-PCR test is fabricated in a way that each country and laboratory perform it differently at too high Ct and that the high rate of false positives increases massively due to cross-reaction with other (corona) viruses in the "flu
External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results.https://t.co/mbNY8bdw1p pic.twitter.com/OQBD4grMth
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) November 29, 2020
4/12
Even asymptomatic, previously called healthy, people are tested (en masse) in this way, although there is no epidemiologically relevant asymptomatic transmission. This means that even healthy people are declared as COVID
Thread web\u2b06\ufe0f\u2b07\ufe0f
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) December 16, 2020
The fabrication of the "asymptomatic (super) spreader" is the coronation of the total nons(ci)ense in the belief system of #CoronasWitnesses.
Asymptomatic transmission 0.7%; 95% CI 0%-4.9% - could well be 0%!https://t.co/VeZTzxXfvT
5/12
Deaths within 28 days after a positive RT-PCR test from whatever cause are designated as deaths WITH COVID. This means that other causes of death are reclassified as
8/8
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) March 24, 2020
By the way, who the f*** created this obviously (almost) worldwide definition of #CoronaDeath?
This is not only medical malpractice, this is utterly insane!https://t.co/FFsTx4L2mw