Get a journal✍️
Being broke is better than making money illegally!
You don't have to be handsome,Get RICH!
Don't do DRUGS!
SUPPORT YOUR FRIENDS!
SEX shouldn't be your Priority
Don't try to win your Ex back
If all she can offer is SEX, cut her off
Get a girl that support your dreams & want you to grow
Stop trying to impress girls that care less about you!
The only woman that won't snitch on you is your MOM
Fathers are also SPECIAL
Make your parents happy!(very important)
Distance yourself from people who (Abuse,disrespect,control,pressure and put you down)
Don't let anyone make you feel you ain't making progress in life
Self confidence will get you ANYTHING & ANYWHERE!
Forgive but never forget so you won't fall twice
Strive for progress not perfection
Tag any guy you think should read this
Don't forget to hit the follow button 💯
Dm for promos
Welcome to King Monye's channel, for stories, movies and music request. Feel at home and have fun.

https://t.co/1pcOntdfmz

You can request any music and movie there.

More from Life

"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."


We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.

Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)

It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.

Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".

You May Also Like

A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.

Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.

6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices

https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x


PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.

735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices

https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ


The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.

The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.