You don't own feelings, they are not who you are
Just like you don't own radio stations you tune into
Feelings are signals of the amount of energy around you & flowing through you
*Thread* - (e)motion
Manipulate Energy, leverage emotions, & defeat low energy
You don't own feelings, they are not who you are
Just like you don't own radio stations you tune into
Feelings are signals of the amount of energy around you & flowing through you
Depression = Repression
It's a lack of expression - cells, brain, body
Energy is not flowing
If you were to:
- Exercise intensely
- Do something creatively stimulating (socializing, writing, producing)
ATP would begin producing
Heart rate would go up
Blood flow would increase
Nervous system would be active
Oxygen would be flowing to the brain & through the body
Until demand is seen you will not be supplied what you need
We are wired to conserve energy
If you inhale too much
You'll FEEL a need to exhale
Energy has no opinions or meaning
We assign opinions & meaning to our emotions
If we choose to interpret low energy as "chill out"
We essentially are inactive spectators taking orders from the flow of energy (reactive)
(aka a human being with free will & consciousness)
You can change the flow of energy by changing your actions
Every action has a reaction
Inaction also has a reaction
You always get more of the same, an object in motion stays in motion
If you can run 10 miles
You're adapted to supply energy to complete 10 miles
If you exert 5000 units of energy daily
Your body adapts to supply 5000 energy units daily
and you demand 900 it'll be a bit uncomfortable
if you demand 5000 it'll be very uncomfortable
We are wired to conserve energy
You soon adapt & will produce 5000 energy units per day with little to no willpower/force
If you exerted a lot of energy
Being tired indicates that energy is spent
But if you're tired & have low energy
Despite doing nothing
The feeling then does not mean "rest" we misinterpret it as rest and end up repressing
Supply/Demand - how much energy are you demanding (action/effort)
will determine how much gets supplied
Efficiency - things you consume, sleep, environment which can unnecessarily inhibit the flow of energy
and how efficient energy conversion is
Supply/Demand is more important than efficiency
Which is why we see plenty of examples of unhealthy people, stressed people, 'low vibe' people
Who are productive, get things done, & have energy
They 'ask' for or demand it via action
Pushing that extra half mile is where the adaptation happens
Showing slightly higher demand, consistently, will adapt
Soon it will be at 3.5 miles where that same tired feeling kicks in
Pushing part is now from 3.5-4
Like a antenna receiving signal
They just display to you the energy around & energy flowing through you
They're not orders
They're also not useless
The balance is to listen, then respond
Not automatically react
Not totally ignore
More from Life
You May Also Like
Trump is gonna let the Mueller investigation end all on it's own. It's obvious. All the hysteria of the past 2 weeks about his supposed impending firing of Mueller was a distraction. He was never going to fire Mueller and he's not going to
Mueller's officially end his investigation all on his own and he's gonna say he found no evidence of Trump campaign/Russian collusion during the 2016 election.
Democrats & DNC Media are going to LITERALLY have nothing coherent to say in response to that.
Mueller's team was 100% partisan.
That's why it's brilliant. NOBODY will be able to claim this team of partisan Democrats didn't go the EXTRA 20 MILES looking for ANY evidence they could find of Trump campaign/Russian collusion during the 2016 election
They looked high.
They looked low.
They looked underneath every rock, behind every tree, into every bush.
And they found...NOTHING.
Those saying Mueller will file obstruction charges against Trump: laughable.
What documents did Trump tell the Mueller team it couldn't have? What witnesses were withheld and never interviewed?
THERE WEREN'T ANY.
Mueller got full 100% cooperation as the record will show.
BREAKING: President Donald Trump has submitted his answers to questions from special counsel Robert Mueller
— Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) November 20, 2018
Mueller's officially end his investigation all on his own and he's gonna say he found no evidence of Trump campaign/Russian collusion during the 2016 election.
Democrats & DNC Media are going to LITERALLY have nothing coherent to say in response to that.
Mueller's team was 100% partisan.
That's why it's brilliant. NOBODY will be able to claim this team of partisan Democrats didn't go the EXTRA 20 MILES looking for ANY evidence they could find of Trump campaign/Russian collusion during the 2016 election
They looked high.
They looked low.
They looked underneath every rock, behind every tree, into every bush.
And they found...NOTHING.
Those saying Mueller will file obstruction charges against Trump: laughable.
What documents did Trump tell the Mueller team it couldn't have? What witnesses were withheld and never interviewed?
THERE WEREN'T ANY.
Mueller got full 100% cooperation as the record will show.
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
