What if... stay with me here... we married standards with effectiveness?
A brief thread... (1/n)
SCOOP: Army leaders are discussing making long-awaited changes to hair and grooming regulations in the name of inclusivity, including allowing some women to wear ponytails & removing offensive language from AR 670-1.
— Haley Britzky (@halbritz) December 29, 2020
Final changes are expected in January.https://t.co/iLrYMONloX
A worthwhile natural experiment can be tattoo standards. (/3)
-not allowed if exposed in Class B
-universally waived to include neck and hand tattoos
-allowed but photographed (all not just gang/racially suspect)
-acceptable for enlistees but not officer candidates (/4)
Did we become more effective when they were tightened?
The easy answer is no. Arbitrary standards are, wait for it, arbitrary.
(/5)
More from Life
It doesn't happen because you want it to happen.
It doesn't happen because you made it happen.
It happens because you allow it to happen.
https://t.co/j5hPyw9m9m
It doesn't happen because you made it happen.
It happens because you allow it to happen.
https://t.co/j5hPyw9m9m
There is a fine line between persistence and stubbornness.
— The Irrational Investor (@position_trader) August 28, 2019
True for life, true for investing.