Tänään on ilmestynyt tietoja että #Rheinmetall voisi toimittaa 🇺🇦:n #Leopard1A5 vaunuja jopa 50 kpl ja joista ensimmäiset saataisiin jo viikossa. #bundeswehr'hän myi vaunut jatkomyytiä varten 2003 jälkeen Rheinmetallille, mutta niistä ei ("yllättäen") tullut myyntimenestystä 1/x
\U0001f1e9\U0001f1ea#Rheinmetall could deliver the first tanks #Leopard1 to #Ukraine\U0001f1fa\U0001f1e6 in six weeks and the rest over the following three months through its subsidiary Rheinmetall Italia if it gets a green light from the German government. https://t.co/DUp8VfLlJB
— \U0001d544\U0001d55a\U0001d55d\U0001d55a\U0001d565\U0001d552\U0001d563\U0001d56a \U0001d546\U0001d553\U0001d564\U0001d556\U0001d563\U0001d567\U0001d556\U0001d563 (@MilitaryEmpire) April 11, 2022
Leopard1A5 onkin varustettu samoilla lämpökameroilla ja ammunnanhallinnalla kun Leopard2A4. 4/x
You May Also Like
Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇
It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details): https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha
I've read it so you needn't!
Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.
The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.
Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.
It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details): https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha
I've read it so you needn't!
Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.
The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.
Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.