Outside Westminster Magistrates' Court for Julian Assange's latest bail hearing.

Craig Murray, ex-diplomat & whistleblower, says he's "very optimistic" Assange will be granted bail because no one who has had their extradition blocked on medical grounds has had the decision reversed upon appeal, so there's no incentive to abscond.

via @SputnikInt
Assange's fiancée @StellaMoris1 & @khrafnsson & @SwaziJAF of WikiLeaks are being temporarily prevented from entering court building. It's unclear why. It could simply be because they've temporarily blocked people from entering for the Assange case and are allowing others through.
Press still not being allowed in. Poorly managed situation. I can't risk not being allowed into the video link room while I wait to get into the building. I've had to go around the corner and sit on some steps outside and follow via video link. Luckily I've got my WIFI broadcast.
Hearing hasn't started yet. Hands freezing cold. Can hear lawyers speaking to each other.
Judge has arrived hearing has begun.
Actually, judge has arrived but Assange doesn't appear to have arrived yet.
Assange has arrived.
Ms Dobbin gives objections to bail for the prosecution. "Madam this court has refused Assange bail" in the past as there was no means to guarantee his surrender, she says. She contends the same remains true today.
"The court has discharged Mr Assange on a single point, his mental health.... It hangs under a single thread".

“It’s the prosecutions submission here that it’s intention to appeal would be frustrated if Mr Assange was not remanded into custody”, Dobbin says
Clair Dobbin is now going into detail about how Assange assisted NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden evade capture by US authorities.
"The President of Mexico offered Mr Assange asylum in his daily press briefing" Clair Dobbin says further to her argument against granting bail to Assange.
“How could this court have any faith” due to his history that shows he's “capable to go to almost any length to avoid being extradited to the US” Dobbin says.
“The court cannot sensibly proceed on the basis that Mr Assange will simply take his chances”, she adds.
Assange also has "network of supporters" who could assist him in absconding whilst on bail, Clair Dobin says. She is also reciting his history when he sought asylum in the Ecuadorian embassy.
Mr Assange considers himself as "above the law" Dobbin argues, noting that people who put up surety last time lost "considerable sums".
Mr Assange is not someone "who felt the pressure or the moral pull" to addhear to prior bail conditions argues Dobbin who says that he "squandered" his bail surety "demonstrating the stringent [bail] conditions" were of "absolutely no consequence".
Prosecution argues that "flight is a far greater likelihood" if indeed Assange's mental health is suffering greatly. She also argues that protection of health and well being is a matter for the MOJ not for a matter of bail.
Clair Dobbin is saying the "most up to date" information she has for Belmarsh prison is that COVID-19 prisoners are now being moved to a separate location so that should keep Assange safer.
Clair Dobbin is also explaining a key aspect of what the US government intends to argue upon appeal. Namely, that the test that "it would be impossible to commit suicide" in the requesting state is not the test, Dobbin argues.
Dobbin is going into detail about their intended appeal that the approach the Judge applied was to apply a "higher threshold" than the European Court of Human Rights applied
Judge has interrupted Clair Dobbin saying she appreciates they intend to appeal but it's not needed to argue the whole argument. "I don't think there is any purpose in the context of the bail application of you setting all your grounds of appeal" Baraitser says.
“The defence relies upon Mr Assange having children in this jurisdiction… the point was made on the last occasion and was made again. Those children were born whilst he was in the embassy…. And it follows from that that they have never lived together.” Dobbin argues.

More from Legal

Last night TPD arrested and charged two known organizers, @DailyTacoma and our own @ohdamn_jam.

So many people acted quickly, and we were able to make sure they both made bail.


You can read @ohdamn_jam's account of what happened here


If you remember, back in August we were made aware that Pierce County diverted COVID funds to monitor us. We know for sure they monitored and reported on this account and anyone associated with it, such as @DailyTacoma

Side note: They were not read their rights until munch later.

You May Also Like

1/“What would need to be true for you to….X”

Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?

A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:


2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to

- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal

3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:

Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.

Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.

4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?

To get clarity.

You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.

It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.

5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”

Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.
🌺कैसे बने गरुड़ भगवान विष्णु के वाहन और क्यों दो भागों में फटी होती है नागों की जिह्वा🌺

महर्षि कश्यप की तेरह पत्नियां थीं।लेकिन विनता व कद्रु नामक अपनी दो पत्नियों से उन्हे विशेष लगाव था।एक दिन महर्षि आनन्दभाव में बैठे थे कि तभी वे दोनों उनके समीप आकर उनके पैर दबाने लगी।


प्रसन्न होकर महर्षि कश्यप बोले,"मुझे तुम दोनों से विशेष लगाव है, इसलिए यदि तुम्हारी कोई विशेष इच्छा हो तो मुझे बताओ। मैं उसे अवश्य पूरा करूंगा ।"

कद्रू बोली,"स्वामी! मेरी इच्छा है कि मैं हज़ार पुत्रों की मां बनूंगी।"
विनता बोली,"स्वामी! मुझे केवल एक पुत्र की मां बनना है जो इतना बलवान हो की कद्रू के हज़ार पुत्रों पर भारी पड़े।"
महर्षि बोले,"शीघ्र ही मैं यज्ञ करूंगा और यज्ञ के उपरांत तुम दोनो की इच्छाएं अवश्य पूर्ण होंगी"।


महर्षि ने यज्ञ किया,विनता व कद्रू को आशीर्वाद देकर तपस्या करने चले गए। कुछ काल पश्चात कद्रू ने हज़ार अंडों से काले सर्पों को जन्म दिया व विनता ने एक अंडे से तेजस्वी बालक को जन्म दिया जिसका नाम गरूड़ रखा।जैसे जैसे समय बीता गरुड़ बलवान होता गया और कद्रू के पुत्रों पर भारी पड़ने लगा


परिणामस्वरूप दिन प्रतिदिन कद्रू व विनता के सम्बंधों में कटुता बढ़ती गयी।एकदिन जब दोनो भ्रमण कर रहीं थी तब कद्रू ने दूर खड़े सफेद घोड़े को देख कर कहा,"बता सकती हो विनता!दूर खड़ा वो घोड़ा किस रंग का है?"
विनता बोली,"सफेद रंग का"।
तो कद्रू बोली,"शर्त लगाती हो? इसकी पूँछ तो काली है"।