Top Data Science courses from Google 🚀

A thread 🧵👇🏻

1/ Big Data & Machine Learning Fundamentals

https://t.co/DR3mieKkdP
2/ Perform Foundational Data, ML, and AI Tasks in Google Cloud

https://t.co/lkb24BzTAW
3/ Create ML Models with BigQuery ML

https://t.co/3BZswXRiyl
4/ Insights from Data with BigQuery

https://t.co/qsQTzpCGne
5/ Exploring Data with Looker

https://t.co/0oftwqMMtK

More from Learning

Trading Strategies 101

14 "must-try" trading strategies you can start using today: 🧵

Collaborated with @niki_poojary

We'll break these into portions of:

1. Intraday Trading Techniques
2. Positional Trading Techniques
3. Indicator Applications

1/ 6 Intraday Strategies 🧵

How to Filter Stocks for Intraday


2/ Intraday BNF strangle based on OI data. 🧵


3/ A few setups to make intraday trading easy.
After reading 100s of short and long ebooks,

We have shortlisted these ebooks every no-code learner should read:

#1 The No-code Revolution

https://t.co/reOSvnTOs6

The ebook from @webflow will provide an overview of the no-code movement and its importance.

It also provides insights on bringing no-code to your company and how it will impact the world!

#2 Zero to MVP with No-code

https://t.co/7JD6RQvocZ

The book written by @MakadiaHarsh, with 21 chapters, provides a complete guide to building no-code apps.

It also explains the difference between no-code, code, & low-code, and 120+ tools to build MVPs.

#3 The What's, How's, and Why's of No-code

https://t.co/YH5L6pJrW0

This book from @QuixyOfficial provides insights on no-code development, how it's different from other development, and why it is essential for stakeholders of an organization.

#4 No-code Ebook

https://t.co/PV6M9oMZCF

The book developed by @NeotaLogic explains the importance of no-code and provides advice on selecting the correct no-code platforms according to requirements.

You May Also Like

IMPORTANCE, ADVANTAGES AND CHARACTERISTICS OF BHAGWAT PURAN

It was Ved Vyas who edited the eighteen thousand shlokas of Bhagwat. This book destroys all your sins. It has twelve parts which are like kalpvraksh.

In the first skandh, the importance of Vedvyas


and characters of Pandavas are described by the dialogues between Suutji and Shaunakji. Then there is the story of Parikshit.
Next there is a Brahm Narad dialogue describing the avtaar of Bhagwan. Then the characteristics of Puraan are mentioned.

It also discusses the evolution of universe.(
https://t.co/2aK1AZSC79 )

Next is the portrayal of Vidur and his dialogue with Maitreyji. Then there is a mention of Creation of universe by Brahma and the preachings of Sankhya by Kapil Muni.


In the next section we find the portrayal of Sati, Dhruv, Pruthu, and the story of ancient King, Bahirshi.
In the next section we find the character of King Priyavrat and his sons, different types of loks in this universe, and description of Narak. ( https://t.co/gmDTkLktKS )


In the sixth part we find the portrayal of Ajaamil ( https://t.co/LdVSSNspa2 ), Daksh and the birth of Marudgans( https://t.co/tecNidVckj )

In the seventh section we find the story of Prahlad and the description of Varnashram dharma. This section is based on karma vaasna.
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.


In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.

In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.

This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.

In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.