1. Mon. 21 Dec. Message from Anon to Patriots: Note: This Anon claims to have daily briefings with POTUS, but there is no way to confirm.
“What I'm about to disclose is the most important post you'll read before the inauguration. Q will not post here again, at least not...
The Restored Republic: The Global Currency Reset has bankrupted Globalists by allowing countries to have their own individual monetary systems. Now the Fed. was dead, with US taxpayer dollars going directly into the US Treasury in Reno and...
As such, leaders of the Cabal including Democrats and other political elites, no longer made millions off their constituents. Evidently they then...
The carry out of that complex plan involved the CIA in conjunction with Cabal members of the Democratic Party & other elite politicians, plus Communist parties in China, Russia, Iran, Venezuela, Germany, Spain and Canada.
Last weekend the Alliance performed a counter attack by completing high level arrests. Trump may invoke...
Last Thurs. 17 Dec. Trump told his staff to get out of DC. It was estimated that 70% of our government politicians would be arrested and prosecuted for being [D]eep State and Chinese...
Before Christmas Eve 24 Dec. 2020, there would be proof given to the American people that we were under attack by the Chinese Communist Party. The CCP were behind inventing and spreading C19, took ownership of the Dominion servers which switched Trump...
More from 🇺🇸I Support Our Military & Law Enforcement🇺🇸
More from Law
Today the superior court will hear oral arguments in Midtown Citizens Coalition v. Municipality of Anchorage. "MCC" is an unofficial group that opposes the recall of Assembly member Felix Rivera. The question is whether the Muni properly certified the recall petition. #aklaw
Before posting the MCC v. MOA briefs, it's worth noting that the legal arguments made by Rivera's supporters parallel those made by Dunleavy in Recall Dunleavy v. State. Both Rivera and Dunleavy argued that their recall petitions should have been denied by election officials.
So let's play a game called "Who Argued It." Guess which politician, Rivera or Dunleavy, made the following arguments in court:
1. "The grounds for recall stated in the petition are insufficient as a matter of law, and therefore the petition should have been rejected."
2. "Even under Alaska’s liberal recall standards, courts have not hesitated to find petitions legally insufficient when those petitions did not contain sufficient factual allegations of unlawful activity to state sufficient grounds for recall.”
3. "The allegations must be sufficiently particular to allow the official a meaningful opportunity to respond . . . . [and] ensure that voters have the information they need to vote."
Oral argument in scheduled for January 21 at 3 pm in this case & will be telephonic. To listen, call 1-800-768-2983, code: 2640561#. Alternate phone numbers if the toll-free number gives you trouble: 1-907-206-2349 or 1-913-904-9867 or 1-212-231-3884.
— Alaska Court System (@AlaskaCourt) January 20, 2021
Before posting the MCC v. MOA briefs, it's worth noting that the legal arguments made by Rivera's supporters parallel those made by Dunleavy in Recall Dunleavy v. State. Both Rivera and Dunleavy argued that their recall petitions should have been denied by election officials.
So let's play a game called "Who Argued It." Guess which politician, Rivera or Dunleavy, made the following arguments in court:
1. "The grounds for recall stated in the petition are insufficient as a matter of law, and therefore the petition should have been rejected."
2. "Even under Alaska’s liberal recall standards, courts have not hesitated to find petitions legally insufficient when those petitions did not contain sufficient factual allegations of unlawful activity to state sufficient grounds for recall.”
3. "The allegations must be sufficiently particular to allow the official a meaningful opportunity to respond . . . . [and] ensure that voters have the information they need to vote."
