Which are the Best Businesses do you wanna own if Correction Comes?
Best Business I would like to add
Chart Attached with Levels and Logic why should buy the dip
Are U ready with bucket list? please share in comment
@Prakashplutus
@jainchintan67
@rohanshah619
@ca_mehtaravi
More from Market Learner 🎯
Targets Achieved as mentioned in last tweet after pyramiding the trade.
Added upside targets if you are holding for longer time frame.
@Puretechnicals9
@ca_mehtaravi
@jainchintan67
Who bought this? https://t.co/Mu3P73Z5tR
Update Chart of #GujaratGas
— Market Learner \U0001f3af (@MarketLearner7) June 3, 2021
Shared Fibonacci view too
Hope you like It.
Already up 8% from last tweet.@Puretechnicals9 @rohanshah619 @ca_mehtaravi https://t.co/mLJlsjRA5w pic.twitter.com/GyREKtB53M
This Sector always rewarded with high Valuation by Mr. Market bcoz of must consumption business
Proxy for Housing and Infra Play
Charts attached - Price at Good Levels
@Vivek_Investor
@WealthEnrich
@caniravkaria https://t.co/ZJOxMx2J8S
Now Domestic Appliance Business
— Market Learner \U0001f3af (@MarketLearner7) June 13, 2021
A must consumption in Kitchen
Enjoying Duopoly in the business#TTK#Hawkins
Compared both players
Analyzed newly listed & Only listed Co in this business
Charts looking Great at CP @Vivek_Investor @vetris_stocks @Stockstudy8 @ca_mehtaravi https://t.co/kltgrigoml pic.twitter.com/VnbguRQd5X
More from Lauruslabs
"Rocket Emojis with to the moon tags"
this business wouldn't hit 3lk cr market cap in next 3 yrs but it can steadily compound at 25-30% YoY for next 10 yrs
At 25% CAGR over 10 yrs, you get a 10 bagger
Keep expectations in check.
Lets talk results #lauruslabs
— Tar \u26a1 (@itsTarH) July 29, 2021
Always zoom out and view the results, never take a QoQ approach.
Here is how Sales, Op.Profit and PAT looks like when you zoom out.
The upwards trends continues.
No business will move linearly up or linearly down. pic.twitter.com/O9UUt1rEE5
You May Also Like
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?