Krsnna Diagnostics IPO notes: 'Let's do Good' ❓

Hit the 'retweet' & help us educate more investors

A thread 🧵👇

#IPOwithJST

1/ Basics about the IPO

Issue Dates: 4 - 6 August
Issue Size: ₹ 1,211 Crore (400crs Fresh Issue & 811crs OFS)
Mcap at the upper band: 2994crs
Price Band: ₹ 933 - 954
Retail Quota: 10%

Promoter stake to go from 32% to 27% post IPO.
2/ About the company.

Krsnaa Diagnostics provides technology-enabled services such as imaging (including radiology), pathology/clinical laboratory, and teleradiology

to public and private hospitals, medical colleges and community health centres across India.
3/ They focus on the public-private partnership (“PPP”) diagnostics segment and have the largest presence in the diagnostic PPP segment.

Contracts are typical of long-term in nature.

Won 77.6% of all tenders since inception & have thus deployed 1823 diagnostic centers.
4/ Operational performance indicators
5/ Strengths

- Cost Competitive: Radiology tests are priced 45%-60% below market rates & pathology tests are 40%-80% below
- Extensive footprint & Infra: Among the few cos. in India to have MRI machines ranging from 0.2-3 Tesla machines & multi-slice CT to 128 slice CT scanners
6/

- High revenue visibility (Non-Covid rev) due to 2-10 year long govt. PPP contracts
- Experienced promoters & management team supported by a strong employee base
7/ Services they offer & the distribution.
8/ Objective of the issue

Plans to use Rs 150 crore to set up 29 diagnostic centres across multiple states.

It also plans to repay/ pre-pay debt worth Rs 146 crore to the lenders in FY22. The company’s total borrowings stood at Rs 231.7 crore as of March 2021.
9/ Financials

- Good Cashflow conversion (80%+ EBITDA)
- Capex heavy business, Working Capital under control
- Strong Margins at 25-30% & gross margins of 80-85%
- COVID benefited the revenues in FY21, Non-COVID rev back to pre-COVID
10/ Risks

- 70% of rev from government agencies: Could lead to payment delays
- Competitive tender bidding process to get in: cost competitiveness could be challenged by some new entrant
- Contracts are based on fixed price arrangements: margins are not under their control.
11/

- 70% of rev from 3 states; Maharashtra, Rajasthan & Karnataka.
- Delays in the establishment of diagnostic centres could lead to termination of the agreements or cost overruns.
- Failure to establish and comply with appropriate quality standards could result in litigations.
12/

At 8x EV/Sales, 32x EV/ EBITDA & more than 90 times earnings, plus the commoditized nature of the industry due to high competition & also the boost in sales from COVID-19, we would rather wait & watch this company face an increasing RM cost scenario.

More from ᴀɴɪsʜ ᴍᴏᴏɴᴋᴀ

You May Also Like

Department List of UCAS-China PROFESSORs for ANSO, CSC and UCAS (fully or partial) Scholarship Acceptance
1) UCAS School of physical sciences Professor
https://t.co/9X8OheIvRw
2) UCAS School of mathematical sciences Professor

3) UCAS School of nuclear sciences and technology
https://t.co/nQH8JnewcJ
4) UCAS School of astronomy and space sciences
https://t.co/7Ikc6CuKHZ
5) UCAS School of engineering

6) Geotechnical Engineering Teaching and Research Office
https://t.co/jBCJW7UKlQ
7) Multi-scale Mechanics Teaching and Research Section
https://t.co/eqfQnX1LEQ
😎 Microgravity Science Teaching and Research

9) High temperature gas dynamics teaching and research section
https://t.co/tVIdKgTPl3
10) Department of Biomechanics and Medical Engineering
https://t.co/ubW4xhZY2R
11) Ocean Engineering Teaching and Research

12) Department of Dynamics and Advanced Manufacturing
https://t.co/42BKXEugGv
13) Refrigeration and Cryogenic Engineering Teaching and Research Office
https://t.co/pZdUXFTvw3
14) Power Machinery and Engineering Teaching and Research
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x


The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x

Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x

The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x

It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x