@punitbansal14 Nice VCP set up, tight build-up near resistance giving hope for another big rally. My short term target is 920. We can see #ingrevia in 4 digit candidate shortly.
More from Vishnu
#AllCargo
🎯Setting up nicely in 10EMA
🎯 Excellent base formation with numerous squats, shakeout and pocket pivots
🎯EPS rate 90, RS rating 80
More detail in thread
@swing_ka_sultan
@Accuracy_Invst @YTA_School @Capt_Kaushaljha @Jitendra_stock @ https://t.co/CRbRYT5feV
🎯Setting up nicely in 10EMA
🎯 Excellent base formation with numerous squats, shakeout and pocket pivots
🎯EPS rate 90, RS rating 80
More detail in thread
@swing_ka_sultan
@Accuracy_Invst @YTA_School @Capt_Kaushaljha @Jitendra_stock @ https://t.co/CRbRYT5feV
#AllCargo
— VCP Charts\U0001f4c8 (@vcpcharts) April 17, 2022
\U0001f3afGood accumulation from base bottom
\U0001f3af Pocket pivots and shakeout will give strength for breakout
\U0001f3af RS strength-81
\U0001f3af EPS strength-90
\U0001f3af Expecting more tightness near pivot point for entry@Accuracy_Invst @swing_ka_sultan @StocksNerd @VVVStockAnalyst @charts_zone pic.twitter.com/yb6pX4Kro5
More from Jubliantingrevia
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x