Dec 2020 tweet
A superb chart (anchor column from lows), but since SL is far away (below 2), buy only worth an amount that you can write off, that too on dips.
— AP (@ap_pune) December 7, 2020
JP Power pic.twitter.com/z8T7bCM9Ul
More from AP
A thread on OI and Options charts for SBI - why it stopped rising at 420 and how one could have identified that.
Why I am talking abt SBI so much?
After the results, almost every brokerage came out with upgrades giving trgts of 500-600-700 on SBI, and it is easy for retail to buy CEs immdly; It might rise later, but the pause in the last 2 days ensured that the CEs fall sharply
For those who missed ithttps://t.co/gb1PpJKQdY
— AP (@ap_pune) May 25, 2021
Why I am talking abt SBI so much?
After the results, almost every brokerage came out with upgrades giving trgts of 500-600-700 on SBI, and it is easy for retail to buy CEs immdly; It might rise later, but the pause in the last 2 days ensured that the CEs fall sharply
Tata Consumer too
There u have 30 now
Stick to these only !!!!
I keep getting msgs from ppl stuck in other stocks.
Just yday, someone asked abt Mindtree.
he shorted a CE and then when he wanted to cover,
the spread was 70 / 92 !!!
How many have faced such a problem?
Please add to this thread with actual examples
stock / strike price and rate
There u have 30 now
Stick to these only !!!!
HCLTECH
— Pathik (@Pathik_Trader) March 31, 2021
WIPRO
M&M
TITAN
Adding into list
Remove AUROPHARMA, BHARTIARTL, TAMO from list (personal hate\U0001f603\U0001f603)
I keep getting msgs from ppl stuck in other stocks.
Just yday, someone asked abt Mindtree.
he shorted a CE and then when he wanted to cover,
the spread was 70 / 92 !!!
How many have faced such a problem?
Please add to this thread with actual examples
stock / strike price and rate
You May Also Like
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?