A simple way to trade stocks is to score all the factors you consider important. ( example below)
Also, consider multiple time frames.
Trade-in stocks which are in top of table (bullish) or bottom of the table ( bearish)
Comments?
More from Jitendra Jain
A good read
AN ESSENTIAL THREAD ON OPTION ADJUSTMENTS
— Sarang Sood (@SarangSood) June 8, 2020
Adjustments can be done in variety of ways & depends totally at the discretion of the trader. To get a clear mind we need to know the following:
1) What to follow,
2) How to make the adjustment,
3) When to make the adjustment. (1/5)
Resolved!
Here is what i did
a) Filed a complaint on phone got a complaint number.
b) Used Twitter to amplify the reach
c) Found C level executives and emailed them, One of C level executives emailed support and asked them to look into it urgently.
d) resolved. https://t.co/arCfnRBhBf
Here is what i did
a) Filed a complaint on phone got a complaint number.
b) Used Twitter to amplify the reach
c) Found C level executives and emailed them, One of C level executives emailed support and asked them to look into it urgently.
d) resolved. https://t.co/arCfnRBhBf
Kal hi mail kiya aur. https://t.co/8kyZhkxz2n pic.twitter.com/xFfo7i23z4
— Jitendra Jain (@jitendrajain) March 15, 2022
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".