Dear sister, know that Aisha RA got married to Prophet Muhammad at a very young age but she has never had children.
This is a message for every sister ЁЯСЗ
Dear sister, know that Aisha RA got married to Prophet Muhammad at a very young age but she has never had children.
Dear sister, the 2 daughters of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) got divorced even though they are the daughters of the messenger of Allah!
Remember dear sister, the first wife and mother of believers Ummi Khadijah RA got married to Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) when she was 40 years old and she got 6 children but syedinna Aisha RA did not have children from him......
Don't worry dear sister, marriage is Rizq from Allah and He will surely grant it to when HE wills it and not when you want it. Don't care of what people may say about you, remember that!
Be patient and be sure that Allah will reward you greatly for your patience,
More from Islam
You May Also Like
Please add your own.
2/ The Magic Question: "What would need to be true for you
1/\u201cWhat would need to be true for you to\u2026.X\u201d
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) December 4, 2018
Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?
A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody: https://t.co/Yo6jHbSit9
3/ On evaluating where someoneтАЩs head is at regarding a topic they are being wishy-washy about or delaying.
тАЬGun to the headтАФwhat would you decide now?тАЭ
тАЬFast forward 6 months after your sabbatical--how would you decide: what criteria is most important to you?тАЭ
4/ Other QтАЩs re: decisions:
тАЬPutting aside a list of pros/cons, whatтАЩs the *one* reason youтАЩre doing this?тАЭ тАЬWhy is that the most important reason?тАЭ
тАЬWhatтАЩs end-game here?тАЭ
тАЬWhat does success look like in a world where you pick that path?тАЭ
5/ When listening, after empathizing, and wanting to help them make their own decisions without imposing your world view:
тАЬWhat would the best version of yourself doтАЭ?
Flat Earth conference attendees explain how they have been brainwashed by YouTube and Infowarshttps://t.co/gqZwGXPOoc
— Raw Story (@RawStory) November 18, 2018
This spring at SxSW, @SusanWojcicki promised "Wikipedia snippets" on debated videos. But they didn't put them on flat earth videos, and instead @YouTube is promoting merchandising such as "NASA lies - Never Trust a Snake". 2/
A few example of flat earth videos that were promoted by YouTube #today:
https://t.co/TumQiX2tlj 3/
https://t.co/uAORIJ5BYX 4/
https://t.co/yOGZ0pLfHG 5/
RT-PCR corona (test) scam
Symptomatic people are tested for one and only one respiratory virus. This means that other acute respiratory infections are reclassified as
4/10
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) October 22, 2020
...indication, first of all that testing for a (single) respiratory virus is done outside of surveillance systems or need for specific therapy, but even so the lack of consideration of Ct, symptoms and clinical findings when interpreting its result. https://t.co/gHH6kwRdZG
2/12
It is tested exquisitely with a hypersensitive non-specific RT-PCR test / Ct >35 (>30 is nonsense, >35 is madness), without considering Ct and clinical context. This means that more acute respiratory infections are reclassified as
6/10
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) October 22, 2020
The neither validated nor standardised hypersensitive RT-PCR test / Ct 35-45 for SARS-CoV-2 is abused to mislabel (also) other diseases, especially influenza, as COVID-19.https://t.co/AkFIfTCTkS
3/12
The Drosten RT-PCR test is fabricated in a way that each country and laboratory perform it differently at too high Ct and that the high rate of false positives increases massively due to cross-reaction with other (corona) viruses in the "flu
External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results.https://t.co/mbNY8bdw1p pic.twitter.com/OQBD4grMth
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) November 29, 2020
4/12
Even asymptomatic, previously called healthy, people are tested (en masse) in this way, although there is no epidemiologically relevant asymptomatic transmission. This means that even healthy people are declared as COVID
Thread web\u2b06\ufe0f\u2b07\ufe0f
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) December 16, 2020
The fabrication of the "asymptomatic (super) spreader" is the coronation of the total nons(ci)ense in the belief system of #CoronasWitnesses.
Asymptomatic transmission 0.7%; 95% CI 0%-4.9% - could well be 0%!https://t.co/VeZTzxXfvT
5/12
Deaths within 28 days after a positive RT-PCR test from whatever cause are designated as deaths WITH COVID. This means that other causes of death are reclassified as
8/8
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) March 24, 2020
By the way, who the f*** created this obviously (almost) worldwide definition of #CoronaDeath?
This is not only medical malpractice, this is utterly insane!https://t.co/FFsTx4L2mw