Delhi High Court is hearing a petition by Sr. Adv. Abhishek Manu Singhvi against the Central Board of Direct Taxes - filed in response to a penalty on Singhvi of about Rs. 57 crores, imposed for undisclosed income of almost Rs. 91 crores.

Singhvi is making submissions on merits of the case.
Delhi High Court has asked Solicitor General Tushar Mehta to consider not taking any precipitative action against Singhvi.
Singhvi: Government has taken a lot of action to reduce tax related litigation. Singhvi refers to a scheme meant to reduce direct tax litigation taken out by the government.
Singhvi: I'm jumping out of sequence to refer to a CBDT Circular which repeats the same objects which were laid down in the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act.
Singhvi: "Specified date" in the Act means Jan 1, 2020, which means they were adding some element of retroactivity as well in the legislation (up to 3 months).
Singhvi: The amazing part is that this Act requires entry only on 2 conditions: one, that there should be a pendency of writ, SLP or appeal, two, that it should be pending on a certain date. There is no other affirmative condition!
Singhvi: The provisions of this Act shall not apply in respect of tax arrears for a search case (search cases only above Rs. 5 crores).

Del HC: Does it include pendency before ITSC?
Singhvi: No, it doesn't include matters pending before ITSC.
Singhvi: One case I'm arguing is of search, within the Rs. 5 crore limit. The other case is of ITSC.
Singhvi: There is no model of the Act saying this nature of proceeding is included and this is not included.
Del HC: What is the amount being discussed here? Is it the amount before the ITSC or the one mentioned in this writ?
Singhvi: It is the amount in this writ. It does not exceed Rs. 5 crores.
Sr. Adv. Arvind Datar: The question is that when an Act has excluded certain things from its scheme, can a Circular subsequently add those things?
Court directs for the matter to be heard on Jan 12.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta: I request for the matter to be held on Jan 13, as it doesn't concern a petition or petitioner, but would apply to the entire country.
Singhvi: My friend is trying to show that there would be an avalanche of matters but that is more imaginary than real.
Court: That is besides the point here for now.
SG Mehta: I'm not showing a red flag here, just telling that I'm not arguing against a particular petitioner here.

Singhvi: I am in agreement that whatever is decided would be the law.
The court has posted the matter for further hearing on Jan 12.

More from Live Law

More from India

Reporters, pundits, activists. Before you echo the notion that Palestinians are being "corralled into small, crowded enclaves", which is in vogue in some circles, here are some facts that you won't find in @btselem's new position paper. Read and decide for yourself.

Thread:


Starting with the West Bank, specifically Area C from which allegedly Palestinians are being systematically pushed into the enclaves of Areas A and B, and replaced by Jewish settlers. If so, we should've seen the demographic balance in Area C shift in the Jews' favor. Has it? /2

Well, there's no evidence for that, certainly none in the paper. Latest UN estimate is ~ 300k Palestinians in Area C in 2013, probably >3 times their number in 1995 when the area was delineated. Jewish population growth in the same area & period was slower or similar at 2.6%./3

While good population stats for Area C are unavailable, there are construction surveys based on aerial photos. Do they support Btselem's claim? Quite the contrary. At least one shows that in recent yrs the total Palestinian residential area expanded more than the Jewish one./4


The same analysis by @RegavimIsrael found that the number of Palestinian structures in Area C increased by 28,600 during 2009-2019, nearly doubling in one decade, far more than the 18,600 built in Jewish settlements in that period, according to official statistics. /5

You May Also Like

क्या आप जानते हैं कि क्या है, पितृ पक्ष में कौवे को खाना देने के पीछे का वैज्ञानिक कारण!

श्राद्ध पक्ष में कौओं का बड़ा ही महत्व है। कहते है कौआ यम का प्रतीक है, यदि आपके हाथों दिया गया भोजन ग्रहण कर ले, तो ऐसा माना जाता है कि पितरों की कृपा आपके ऊपर है और वे आपसे ख़ुश है।


कुछ लोग कहते हैं की व्यक्ति मरकर सबसे पहले कौवे के रूप में जन्म लेता है और उसे खाना खिलाने से वह भोजन पितरों को मिलता है

शायद हम सबने अपने घर के किसी बड़े बुज़ुर्ग, किसी पंडित या ज्योतिषाचार्य से ये सुना होगा। वे अनगिनत किस्से सुनाएंगे, कहेंगे बड़े बुज़ुर्ग कह गए इसीलिए ऐसा करना

शायद ही हमें कोई इसके पीछे का वैज्ञानिक कारण बता सके।

हमारे ऋषि मुनि और पौराणिक काल में रहने वाले लोग मुर्ख नहीं थे! कभी सोचियेगा कौवों को पितृ पक्ष में खिलाई खीर हमारे पूर्वजों तक कैसे पहुंचेगी?

हमारे ऋषि मुनि विद्वान थे, वे जो बात करते या कहते थे उसके पीछे कोई न कोई वैज्ञानिक कारण छुपा होता था।

एक बहुत रोचक तथ्य है पितृ पक्ष, भादो( भाद्रपद) प्रकृति और काक के बीच।

एक बात जो कह सकते कि हम सब ने स्वतः उग आये पीपल या बरगद का पेड़/ पौधा किसी न किसी दीवार, पुरानी

इमारत, पर्वत या अट्टालिकाओं पर ज़रूर देखा होगा। देखा है न?

ज़रा सोचिये पीपल या बरगद की बीज कैसे पहुंचे होंगे वहाँ तक? इनके बीज इतने हल्के भी नहीं होते के हवा उन्हें उड़ाके ले जा सके।
Still wondering about this 🤔


save as q