Hello Ma'am. Can you publish an article on SSC CGL'19 results? BJP is not right everywhere. As an editor, it's your responsibility to bring the attention of masses towards these issues too. Please look into the issue and write about the injustice we students are facing from SSC.

@UnSubtleDesi Well for starters, when modiji is talking about Digital India and all the other schemes, then why's an online exam, whose result normally takes 3-4 days to publish being stretched to 3 months, and that's just one of the 4 exams and document verification to be done to get a 1/n
@UnSubtleDesi post through SSC CGL. The whole process takes about 3 years (CGL'18 result has not been even finalised yet and it's 2021 already).
Now coming to the matter at hand (CGL'19), Tier 2 exam was conducted in 3 days for just 1,25,000 students. Why weren't the exams conducted in 2/n
@UnSubtleDesi a single day? And even if the exams were conducted on 3 dates, viz. 15,16and 18 November, why was the difference in difficulty level so huge? There is a process of normalization which equates the marks of the students based on the difficulty level of paper of a certain day, 3/n
@UnSubtleDesi but the paper on 18th was so easy that the whole algorithm just collapsed. Imagine the shock of the students when the saw the cutoff 528/600 in comparision to the cutoff of last year (433/600). Students who got 450 on 15th and 16th cleared this cutoff and students who got 556 4/n
@UnSubtleDesi 556 on 18th couldn’t (since their raw marks in Maths decreased when normalised). Just imagine getting 556/600 and not getting selected!! And on the top of that, the whole drama has increased many folds since SSC decided not to disclose the actual marks of students. 5/n
@UnSubtleDesi It said that it would publish it combined with the marks of Tier 3, creating more suspense and anxiety among students who were even qualified (including me). If the results came out on the basis of a cutoff, then marks have already been rewarded to the students, 6/n
@UnSubtleDesi why not show them now? They probably are going to show it in May mid or last just before the exams of CGL’20 so students don’t get any time to protest. The things I’ve mentioned here are just the tip of the iceberg. 7/n
@UnSubtleDesi Ma’am you have a HUUGE following, many people, and influential ones read what you write. Please raise this issue and help us get justice. Atleast respond so that we know that you listen to our problems and are willing to do some research on it. 8/n
@UnSubtleDesi I’m not against the government, anyone who goes through my tl can confirm that, but these are some genuine problems that needs to be addressed.
Thank You!!

More from India

In his letters describing the India Mission, Carey has given us an insight into how the society functioned then, of how the minds of the people worked and what methods the missionaries used to approach and brainwash the common people.


It is entirely possible that,Carey in his arrogance of being the white man and hence more civilized,his inability to under the Hindu scriptures and his natural disdain for the learned community coupled with his inherent hatred for the idolaters may have exaggerated the incidents.

In fact, considering the venom with which he has spoken about Hinduism and it's practices, it's likely that he has exaggerated these incidents. But it cannot be denied that these incidents did happen even if they may not have been on scale at which Carey has described.

One of his journal entry mentions a debate which happened in a temple in front of around 200 people. Carey describes having debated with two learned men and goes on to say when both learned men failed to answer his questions, he went on to preach the gospel to the assembled crowd


In a letter dated 30th June,1795 he goes on to gleefully narate how Hindus were unaware of their own scriptures and how an supposed expert named a grammar book when he was questioned as which scripture said that the Murti is God.

You May Also Like