https://t.co/Lchqz8WGw0
Sharing 2 my personal fav stock filtering publically now in real time to get stock for watchlist, but analysis before taking trade.
1. Range
https://t.co/Lchqz8WGw0
Thanks!
So once i see gud bo then i can take trade.
https://t.co/QgNQdu4Xbw
https://t.co/rq45EUdw2L
If u r doing intra simply buy aggresive bo or trendline break near to vwap. And trail once in Profit.
Orientcem .....Volume Breakout Candidate pic.twitter.com/74D0T5AGZl
— DON LEON (@donleon52) December 17, 2020
Short term fno trend reversal stocks for intraday to small tf swing. Please do the technical analysis at ur end bcoz sometimes even bearish stock u will face. Thats why not shared earlier, please wait atleast HH HL formation. https://t.co/oD5MjgJ5PS
— SanJeet Kumar \U0001f426 (@sanjufunda) January 29, 2021
https://t.co/ahrFSPzwiz
Momentum Stocks Picking:
— SanJeet Kumar \U0001f426 (@sanjufunda) July 22, 2021
Result Script + Move more than 1.5ATR move either side.
That's it enter whenever see low risk in direction.
One more thing want to rectify; scanner just give you watchlist not trade; According ur technical judgement trade it, before using it just observed few days as well.
You May Also Like
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
