Invested in Indian Energy Exchange IEX ? Checkout this blog, all recent blocks in one place. Found useful ? Share with your investor friends &
More from Iexinfo
#IEX
#IEX
● POWER MARKET SEES 8,997 MU VOLUME IN SEPT’21 ACHIEVING 59% YOY GROWTH
● Q2 FY’22 SEES 25,857 MU VOLUME ACROSS MARKET SEGMENTS WITH 57 % YOY
GROWTH
● IEX LAUNCHES VALUE ADDED SERVICES FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATORS
IEX ACHIEVES 59% GROWTH YOY #BREAKING pic.twitter.com/cWZacwq48N
— Redbox India (@REDBOXINDIA) October 1, 2021
#IEX
● POWER MARKET SEES 8,997 MU VOLUME IN SEPT’21 ACHIEVING 59% YOY GROWTH
● Q2 FY’22 SEES 25,857 MU VOLUME ACROSS MARKET SEGMENTS WITH 57 % YOY
GROWTH
● IEX LAUNCHES VALUE ADDED SERVICES FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATORS

Those who are interested in IEX should read this.
While the market size may grow a lot in the next decade, the government policy risk still stays.
Pic 1: PTC Q4FY21 call
Pic 2: PTC Q1FY22 call
https://t.co/eImnTNEZeX
While the market size may grow a lot in the next decade, the government policy risk still stays.
Pic 1: PTC Q4FY21 call
Pic 2: PTC Q1FY22 call
https://t.co/eImnTNEZeX

Long term investing is a peaceful & slow way of creating wealth.And sometime luck plays its role too.
— SmartSyncServices.com (@SmartSyncServ) September 1, 2021
When we researched IEX in 2019 & recommended investors to buy in Mar 2020, we never anticipated such high growth & 470%+ rise in 1.5 Yrs.@MashraniVivekhttps://t.co/qZIdI10ybc pic.twitter.com/v4UYa6fRyn
120: It's just a power exchange
250: Electricity in India won't grow
300: It just makes 4paise per trade
350: MBED will erode it's profitablilty
500: Maybe what @itsTarH said about IEX = NSE + Zerodha was right
570: Buys IEX
#JourneyOfAPessimist
250: Electricity in India won't grow
300: It just makes 4paise per trade
350: MBED will erode it's profitablilty
500: Maybe what @itsTarH said about IEX = NSE + Zerodha was right
570: Buys IEX
#JourneyOfAPessimist
Zerodha + NSE = IEX \U0001f4a1\u26a1\ufe0f
— Tar \u26a1 (@itsTarH) June 20, 2021
You May Also Like
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.

Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)

There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.

At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?