More from Saket Reddy
MINDTREE
Double Top Buy above 2233.36 daily close on 1% Box size chart. https://t.co/Grtz9Pi3vU
Double Top Buy above 2233.36 daily close on 1% Box size chart. https://t.co/Grtz9Pi3vU
MINDTREE
— Saket Reddy (@saketreddy) December 22, 2020
The company is an international information technology consulting and implementation organisation that delivers business solutions through global software development.
DTB above 1619.22 daily close on 3% box size chart, DTB active on 1% chart. https://t.co/dhQmouQ9Wt pic.twitter.com/g8Rgz7fA0A
JUBLFOOD
Double Top Buy & T20 Pattern - Bullish above 4058.33 daily close on 1% Box Size chart. https://t.co/DPEehZwkS4
Double Top Buy & T20 Pattern - Bullish above 4058.33 daily close on 1% Box Size chart. https://t.co/DPEehZwkS4
JUBLFOOD
— Saket Reddy (@saketreddy) June 24, 2020
Achieved the second target of 1820 today, now near the first target of 1780!
Got a nice 15-20% move till now.
Trailing stop loss is the best thing one can do now! https://t.co/YidPZamyxz
You May Also Like
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.