#HIKAL
Bullish continuation
keep SL 575 on closing basis for 1169/1241
#AhmedabadNest #RelativeStrength #Outperformance #invest #India
More from NISHSHKUMAR JAANI
More from Hikal
Key insights from Hikal
🧪 Lowered interest rates
🧪 Pharma: Growth in generics as well as CDMO
🧪 Crop Protection: Scaleup of a fungicide for a Japanese CDMO client
🧪 Healthy pipeline of new products: Supported by new capacities; Investing in Animal Health & Biocides verticals https://t.co/D70j9oriCa
🧪 Lowered interest rates
🧪 Pharma: Growth in generics as well as CDMO
🧪 Crop Protection: Scaleup of a fungicide for a Japanese CDMO client
🧪 Healthy pipeline of new products: Supported by new capacities; Investing in Animal Health & Biocides verticals https://t.co/D70j9oriCa
Hikal: Strong
— JST Investments (@JstInvestments) August 5, 2021
\U0001f9ea Rev up 27% YoY
\U0001f9ea 22% EBITDA margin
\U0001f9ea Pat of 50crs
\U0001f9ea Growth across both pharmaceuticals & crop protection.#Q1withJST #Pharma pic.twitter.com/8lFo68KzPe
You May Also Like
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
