Key insights from Hikal

🧪 Lowered interest rates
🧪 Pharma: Growth in generics as well as CDMO
🧪 Crop Protection: Scaleup of a fungicide for a Japanese CDMO client
🧪 Healthy pipeline of new products: Supported by new capacities; Investing in Animal Health & Biocides verticals https://t.co/D70j9oriCa

More from JST Investments

A Thread of our threads on the Business Analysis of specific companies 🧵👇

RT if this adds value to your investing journey.


1/ Chemcon: A specialty chemical company that is a globally dominant player in its molecules, most of which go into the Pharmaceutical industry & have a high criticality attached to


2/ Aegis Logistics: An oil & gas logistics company, with a stronghold on the LPG supply chain & riding the tailwinds of increased exports owning to weak domestic production. Their fight to grow much larger is on, short-term demand problems


3/ Varroc Engineering: An auto ancillary company that has propelled down under its own enterprising projects fueled by a ton of debt. Will the fortunes ever illuminate for this significant participant of the global automobile


4/ Jubilant Ingrevia: A specialty chemical company that has redefined backward integration as it begins from the basic chemicals to achieving complex vitamins & many more. Their fight to outgrow commoditized parts of the business goes

More from Hikal

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?