After therapy sessions, it is occurring to me how my parents and maybe most desi parents don't really grow as parents. For example, a person would be a very different to a baby and to a teenager because the needs and vulnerabilities are so different.

But here, I feel that growth for parents stagnants sometime around when a child is 12-13. None of our parents really talk to us about puberty and growing up. None of us are taught or can talk about relationships because of moral reasons. So what do you have?
You have parents who are still parenting their adult children like kids, not apologising to us but asking us to eat, reminding us to wear jackets, locking up cars. They care. But they are coming from a care where the parent is always concerned about keeping the kid safe and alive
which imo really reduces the kind of parental advice and care one needs as an adult. Because adults know enough about the world to no longer be infantilized but we still have parents who expect us to be the same children because they're still the same kind of parents.
This is why so many of our parental relationships are strained or just based on civilities. We're forced to hide a lot from them because parents refuse to grow as parents and acknowledge us as adults. How many of us are still lectured, have curfews, other restrictions?
Parents love us. They really do and they try to love us in the ways they always did because it always worked before but cooking a favourite meal in response to an emotionally disturbed adult versus a kid throwing a tantrum are 2 different things.
Or infantilizing you by speaking to in the same "I am older and know better" tone whenever you DO go to them with adult decisions. These things may have worked when we were kids and we did believe they were older and wiser.
But to have any relationship, parents really need to evolve as parents. They need to first acknowledge that the child they love is a teenager/adult now and has different needs which require a different form of parenting than the infantilizing one they've been used to giving.
I don't really see this happening because tbh, our parents don't want growth. Especially as parents. They're fine loving you in the same way because let's be honest, how many of us actually turn away a meal and say what we actually want from them? How many of us will be rejected?
How many of us cannot even bring these topics up because it will end in your mom and dad becoming taunt-y and snide and actually make things worse? The best thing (which is working for me) is recognizing that my parents never "grew up" as parents.
Its recognition that they love me in their own way even if it's not the love I need. I really wish they would evolve too because I would love to tell them a lot about me since I have not grown up in their eyes since I was 12. But that won't happen ever.
So whenever I'm frustrated now by how my parents are being. Whether it's in response to me establishing boundaries or me making professional decisions, I try to understand their gestures and their perspective which doesn't justify what they do/don't do but explains it a lot.
I also try to remember that my parents were also parented by other people who have probably inflicted their own traumas and troubles on them. So it's important for me to recognise and see how my mother is projecting or how my dad is displacing his own issues.
Parents do become a major psychological and personality foundation for us. In so many ways. Like I'm still learning daily how much of my current behaviours and patterns are formed by them and also learning their own issues and problems through what I know.
I also know this isn't much. Why should we be doing all the work & emotional labour? Why are we expected to be better? But this is how patterns and generational trends are broken. At the end of the day, despite the label of the word, parents are still human and very flawed ones.

More from Health

Now you know I love to sh-t in Harvard. But I also like accuracy. So I decided to go look at Harvard’s catalog to see its lack of military history that this article describes (they only teach history of pets it claims) and what I found shocked me! Shocked me! A thread: 1/


First off, Harvard students literally have multiple sections of military history that they can take listed. (It appears these ones are taught at MIT, so they might have to walk down the street for these) but... 2/


Say they want to stay on campus...they can only take numerous classes on war and diplomacy...3/


They have an entire class on Yalta. That’s right. An entire class on Yalta. 4/


But wait! There is more! They can take the British Empire, The Fall of the Roman Empire for those wanting traditional topics... 5/

You May Also Like

1/ Here’s a list of conversational frameworks I’ve picked up that have been helpful.

Please add your own.

2/ The Magic Question: "What would need to be true for you


3/ On evaluating where someone’s head is at regarding a topic they are being wishy-washy about or delaying.

“Gun to the head—what would you decide now?”

“Fast forward 6 months after your sabbatical--how would you decide: what criteria is most important to you?”

4/ Other Q’s re: decisions:

“Putting aside a list of pros/cons, what’s the *one* reason you’re doing this?” “Why is that the most important reason?”

“What’s end-game here?”

“What does success look like in a world where you pick that path?”

5/ When listening, after empathizing, and wanting to help them make their own decisions without imposing your world view:

“What would the best version of yourself do”?