You will find this interesting 🤯

Health Insurance premiums for a plan are as follows:
5 Lakh cover = Rs. 13410/-
25 Lakh cover = Rs. 24759/-
1 Crore cover = Rs. 18003/-
Wut? Yes. How? 🤔

Thread time 🧵:)

We checked if the plans were different.

What we found is that apart from the room eligibility there is no other significant difference between the plans.

This may have called for a lower “per lakh” premium, but it does not justify a discount of 37% for a 400% higher cover
So we dug deeper :)

We checked, rechecked, spoke to experts and the answer came down to simple market mathematics 🧮

Something you need to understand well.
Say you have a mobile plan with a quota of 3GB of data a day.

The average usage is say 2 GB a day.

Now if you apply for an upgrade to 10GB a day - the telco knowing this will rarely be utilised, can upgrade the plan at an extremely low cost, and not at the per GB rate.
Similarly, when you today buy a cover of 25 Lakhs. Since the average claims are say 3 Lakhs today, there are very tiny chances you will use the cover over 10 Lakhs in the short term.

So whatever amount the insurer charges today over 10 Lakhs is a bonus.
But here's what you should know:

Once claims increase, every insurer can hike premium rates post approval from the regulator.

Premiums can be hiked, the product can be withdrawn moving u to an elite product with way higher premium grids.
What you should do❓
1. Even if premiums will be hiked in the long run, you still need a high cover.
2. Ensure u buy adequate cover for your old age today. If you are 35, you will need 26L at 70 (5% inflation)
3. Do not postpone.
4. Upgrades are difficult if you have an illness
5. ⚖️ Compare premiums for the adequate cover with higher covers available.
6. If you find the difference in premium negligible or lower (like in the first tweet) take the higher cover.
7. Remember, it’s super easy to downgrade ⤵️ cover, if premiums become unaffordable.
Questions?
Insurance experts can answer them here:

https://t.co/JYfL15hGWt

More from Health

this simple, counter narrative fact keeps cropping up all over the world.

hospital and ICU utilization has been and remains low this year.

it's terribly curious that so few of these monitoring tools provide historical baselines.

getting them is like pulling teeth.


we might think of this as an oversight until you see stuff like this:

this woman was arrested for filming and sharing the fact that their are empty hospitals in the UK.

that's full blown soviet. what possible honest purpose does that

this is the action of a police state and a propaganda ministry, not a well intentioned government and a public heath agency.

"we cannot let people see the truth for fear they might base their actions on real facts" is not much of a mantra for just governance.


90% full ICU sounds scary until you realize that 90-100% full is normal in flu season.

staffed ICU beds are expensive to leave empty. it's like flying with 15% of the plane empty. hospitals don't do that.

and all US hospitals are mandated to be able to flex to 120% ICU.

the US is currently at historically low ICU utilization for this time of year.

61% is "you're all going to go out of business" territory as is 66% full hospital use.

can you blame them for mining CARES act money? they'll die without it.

You May Also Like