The UK government is reportedly planning to install former Daily Mail editor Paul Dacre as chair of the broadcasting regulator OFCOM. Some background: https://t.co/psZabLCOaD 1/

Polls have consistently shown that the UK public currently has a much higher level of trust in TV and radio media than they do in the UK newspaper industry, which has consistently been found to be the least trusted in Europe: https://t.co/EY7DnA8SvW /2
The UK public's low level of trust in our newspaper industry should perhaps come as no surprise. In 2016 the Daily Mail and Sun were both called out for "fuelling prejudice" in an international report on rising racist violence: https://t.co/mdwZoWPtgf /3
In 2015, the United Nations spoke out, condemning "decades of sustained and unrestrained anti-foreigner abuse, misinformation and distortion" in the UK press: https://t.co/maP2ZIElrL /4
By contrast, UK broadcast media are currently held to a much higher set of standards. Although not perfect, OFCOM has strong powers to tackle racist and hateful coverage within TV and radio, eg: https://t.co/hXjbtkgU2s /5
This is markedly different from the situation in the United States, where broadcasting regulations are much weaker. In the US, channels such as Fox News have been able to free to operate in ways which - currently - would not be allowed by OFCOM /6 https://t.co/EFpocKwGI5
Some examples of recent Fox News coverage on the pandemic: https://t.co/coYad7qDCv /7
And here's how Fox covered the aftermath of the US Presidential election: https://t.co/0Ad6Ygo9mA /8
And while the UK government is reportedly working to install Paul Dacre as Chair of the broadcasting regulator OFCOM, there are multi-million pound plans underway to implement *two* new "Fox News style" TV channels in Britain: https://t.co/IGVZLrDKCM /9
More here on the Daily Mail during Dacre's tenure: https://t.co/OTTTTgN01T /10
Meanwhile there are already some signs of a wider effort to attack OFCOM, and lobby for a weakening of its role: https://t.co/NJMFUYB6Lz /11
CNN gives a good summary here of the difference that OFCOM *currently* makes in the UK - with thanks to @StevenJBarnett for flagging this: https://t.co/5GJ4BjDNq1 /12
"I will make a prediction that within a year we will see a concerted attack within the Murdoch press on Ofcom" - @StevenJBarnett /13
https://t.co/5GJ4BjDNq1
If the UK government's moves with Ofcom do lead to a significant degrading of media standards on UK TV & radio, then it's possible that our broadcast media may end up being as widely distrusted as our press /14 https://t.co/aA1PMa1qhS
Nonetheless, the great work of @Slpng_Giants and @MMFA in the US has shown that it *is* still possible to challenge toxic media like Fox News, even where effective regulation is lacking: https://t.co/YgpKTlisWJ /15

More from Government

You May Also Like

Oh my Goodness!!!

I might have a panic attack due to excitement!!

Read this thread to the end...I just had an epiphany and my mind is blown. Actually, more than blown. More like OBLITERATED! This is the thing! This is the thing that will blow the entire thing out of the water!


Has this man been concealing his true identity?

Is this man a supposed 'dead' Seal Team Six soldier?

Witness protection to be kept safe until the right moment when all will be revealed?!

Who ELSE is alive that may have faked their death/gone into witness protection?


Were "golden tickets" inside the envelopes??


Are these "golden tickets" going to lead to their ultimate undoing?

Review crumbs on the board re: 'gold'.


#SEALTeam6 Trump re-tweeted this.
A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.

Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.

6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices

https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x


PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.

735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices

https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ


The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.

The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.