https://t.co/GlUkwxodfM
I wrote about the charges filed so far in connection to the assault on the Capitol, how they compare to those filed against J20 and BLM protesters, and the problem with things like over-broad conspiracy charges and felony murder.
A few thoughts.
https://t.co/GlUkwxodfM
You can read @MazMHussain here https://t.co/mXhAnXqZGy
@akela_lacy here https://t.co/YS7L36qyCC
@natashalennard here
https://t.co/1HLtws5PMy
and @aaron_con_choco here https://t.co/wAlulm097I
I wrote about it here: https://t.co/AXWzToLT8N
Here's more about it and a short film by @stephtangk about @BBOflock's story.
https://t.co/ZdzoKZ2nHx
Prosecutors now find themselves with the responsibility of ensuring there are consequences for unprecedented criminal conduct and a message that such violence cannot be tolerated, even as it was called for by the President and enabled by elected officials.
https://t.co/ZK0MJWggKz by @AlexEmmons
https://t.co/KSqcVIVRBH by @mazmhussain
https://t.co/oaYwSAh1l4 by @AlleenBrown & @akela_lacy
https://t.co/MPCyBTnlbZ
https://t.co/54C69VWjMR
So how the hell did January 6 still happen?
The system we do have is not equipped to do that.
There should be accountability, unquestionably, but I doubt our justice system can deliver that.
https://t.co/R5Kd2pDmY6
More from Government
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".