"Action track 2" of the UN Food Systems Summit will be:
-Chaired by EAT's founder
-Have WHO as anchoring agency
-Have an "innovation pillar" led by the Good Food Institute (a lobby group for vegan lab-foods)

Now imagine the outcome of this triumvirate!🤔
https://t.co/HIqS0q5at3

Background here: https://t.co/1LL7ba3Quz
What is the GFI? An extremely well-funded lobby platform, representing producers of lab-generated foods that are meant to take over "outdated" animal foods.
On the advisory board we find some people like the founder of FAIRR (Jeremy Coller) and the Saudi Prince Khaled bin Alwaleed.
Here's some info on FAIRR, Alwaleed, and the $$$.

https://t.co/1LL7ba3Quz
To give you an idea of the mindset: "dairy is the root of all environmental evil", says the guy with the big wallet.

This person is advising the GFI, which in turn will be leading the "innovation pillar" of the UN Food Systems Summit... !

https://t.co/Ap99qrVIMo
The vegan-warrior Prince is also close to EAT, of which -remember- the founder is *chairing* the "sustainable diet" track of the same UN Food Systems Summit

https://t.co/hbCPzPyKwr
Here's the happy bunch together: EAT's founder (middle with dog), the Prince (right), & a couple of GFI-linked folks at the UN headquarters in UN, discussing transition options to a veganized future.

This was in 2018.
https://t.co/o15Rwntfhp
There's more:
50by40= vegan & animal rights organizations + WRI (close ally of EAT), True Health Initiative (with EAT's Walter Willett as core member) & GFI!

Their aim? '50% reduction in global production & consumption of farmed animal products by 2040"
https://t.co/twl5UDsCza
So what's the UN Food Systems Summit's track on Sustainable Diets going to bring us, with these people in charge? Wait & see. But it probably will involve a Great Food Transformation. A what? This: https://t.co/F8NzBgTiUf
For those able to read French, this excellent book by @GillesLuneau talks in detail about the GFI background ($$$, vegan ideology, transhumanism, ...):

https://t.co/1d7LQcrtTe
Feel like exploring more? This metathread should keep you busy...

https://t.co/rIXTJla2pJ

More from Government

Which metric is a better predictor of the severity of the fall surge in US states?

1) Margin of Democrat victory in Nov 2020 election
or
2) % infected through Sep 1, 2020

Can you guess which plot is which?


The left plot is based on the % infected through Sep 1, 2020. You can see that there is very little correlation with the % infected since Sep 1.

However, there is a *strong* correlation when using the margin of Biden's victory (right).

Infections % from
https://t.co/WcXlfxv3Ah.


This is the strongest single variable I've seen in being able to explain the severity of this most recent wave in each state.

Not past infections / existing immunity, population density, racial makeup, latitude / weather / humidity, etc.

But political lean.

One can argue that states that lean Democrat are more likely to implement restrictions/mandates.

This is valid, so we test this by using the Government Stringency Index made by @UniofOxford.

We also see a correlation, but it's weaker (R^2=0.36 vs 0.50).

https://t.co/BxBBKwW6ta


To avoid look-ahead bias/confounding variables, here is the same analysis but using 2016 margin of victory as the predictor. Similar results.

This basically says that 2016 election results is a better predictor of the severity of the fall wave than intervention levels in 2020!

You May Also Like

Trump is gonna let the Mueller investigation end all on it's own. It's obvious. All the hysteria of the past 2 weeks about his supposed impending firing of Mueller was a distraction. He was never going to fire Mueller and he's not going to


Mueller's officially end his investigation all on his own and he's gonna say he found no evidence of Trump campaign/Russian collusion during the 2016 election.

Democrats & DNC Media are going to LITERALLY have nothing coherent to say in response to that.

Mueller's team was 100% partisan.

That's why it's brilliant. NOBODY will be able to claim this team of partisan Democrats didn't go the EXTRA 20 MILES looking for ANY evidence they could find of Trump campaign/Russian collusion during the 2016 election

They looked high.

They looked low.

They looked underneath every rock, behind every tree, into every bush.

And they found...NOTHING.

Those saying Mueller will file obstruction charges against Trump: laughable.

What documents did Trump tell the Mueller team it couldn't have? What witnesses were withheld and never interviewed?

THERE WEREN'T ANY.

Mueller got full 100% cooperation as the record will show.