For anyone who is interested in the goings on of UsForThem you may like to read this thread, it might be a bit long so bare with me! Firstly huge credit to @UsEngland who created a post yesterday that started this all off.

Yesterday UsForThem put out a position statement as you can see this has been written in partnership with @T4Recovery known as Time for recovery you can read about them on their website https://t.co/qyNu7yJfUb
I found it quite interesting that Time For Recovery is a ltd company which was incorporated on 17 Dec 2020, one of it's directors is listed as Jonathon Paul Dobson. TFR also have another company attached to them called Restore the Balance Ltd.
Restore the balance has the same registered address as TFR and was incorporated on 24 Sept 2020. Listed in it's directors is a Jonathon Paul Dobinson. Mr Dobinson is also the director of a creative media company called Other.
TFR have been responsible for various media campaigns across the capital
Interesting resemblance to this?
Mr Dobinson is a very busy man not only is he directors of these three companies he is also listed as a director of World4Brexit, a scheme launched by Nigel Farage. I found it very interesting to read what has been said about these groups so will put it here for you to read.
https://t.co/OgFuiiudQX
https://t.co/eTbY7t9Qpn
credit to @fascinatorfun for this one https://t.co/cRYk9S3AXY
https://t.co/6A2eRxrmdi
I hope you find this as interesting as I did!
A little bit more information that I have found about Mr Dobinson @karamballes https://t.co/Uqold0M85H

More from Government

This is a good piece on fissures within the GOP but I think it mischaracterizes the Trump presidency as “populist” & repeats a story about how conservatives & the GOP expelled the far-right in the mid-1960s that is actually far more complicated. /1

I don’t think the sharp opposition between “hard-edge populism” & “conservative orthodoxy” holds. Many of the Trump administration’s achievements were boilerplate conservatism. Its own website trumpets things like “massive deregulation,” tax cuts, etc. /2

https://t.co/N97v85Bb79


The claim that Buckley and “key GOP politicians banded together to marginalize anti-Communist extremism and conspiracy-mongering” of the JBS has been widely repeated lately but the history is more complicated. /3


This tweet by @ThePlumLineGS citing a paper by @sam_rosenfeld and @daschloz on the "porous" boundary between conservatives, the GOP and the far-right is relevant in this context.


This is a separate point but I find it interesting that Gaetz, like Roy Moore did In his failed Senate campaign, disses McConnell. What are their actual policy differences? MM supported taking health care away from millions, a tax cut for the rich, conservative judges, etc. /5

You May Also Like

1/“What would need to be true for you to….X”

Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?

A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:


2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to

- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal

3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:

Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.

Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.

4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?

To get clarity.

You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.

It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.

5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”

Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.