Thread.
A 'soft' separation is in our best interest. The Constitution allows one state to enter into a compact with another. Multiple states may also enter into compacts. We see this with the DMV where 47 states have enteted into a data exchange.

Another example is the Atlantic Salmon Compact that permits New England states to manage fish stocks in the Connecticut River Basin. They do this collectively, among the states.
With a failed federal congress, corrupted SCOTUS and dangerous subverses operating within the executive this may be Constitution loving states best option. And it is well within their power.
We could, among our states, sign on to Agriculture, immigration, tech, commerce, and/or education compacts among many, many others that would allow us to regulate ourselves as a seperate entity without needing the federal govt or the malignant states approval or signatures.
We create and establish new partnerships for varying policy areas which hardens the alliances, thus creating strength. Thus begins the 'soft' seperation. Red states combined provide their voters with what theyve actually voted for. No need for New York pork spending.
Among our states we could eliminate income tax as a policy, right to carry open or concealed, no lockdowns, etc. We would basically realign ourselves and by forming these compacts return power from a small cluster in D.C. to ourselves and our states.
Well what if this just forms new bureaucracy? Rotate compact seats of govt every few years, not allowing any 1 area to become an entrenched nightmare of unelected govt types and lobbyists. South Carolina for 2 years, Kansas for another 2, etc.
There would be a lot to take in to consideration, but reclaiming policy power at the state level is vital in any future, regardless of President. Trump wint be around forever and we dont need a Constitutional convention or Congress to do so many of the things we already agree on.
The left is already doing similar things to recall power to the states. We arent. Cali sent Jerry Brown to meet Chinese president Xi Jinping after Paris Accord withdraw. Massachusetts and Maryland refused to deploy National Guard troops to support Trump’s border policies.
Some left states have attempted to enforce their own citizenship policies, with a dozen permitting undocumented immigrants to acquire driver’s licenses and nearly twice as many to allow them to qualify for in-state tuition.
Seven states, along with many municipal governments, have adopted “sanctuary” policies of official noncooperation with federal immigration enforcement. We wont be "losing" anything. We'll be SAVING our states. Otherwise in 20 years TX votes like Cali, N.C. like New York.
Those on the right and who love the Constitution need to stop being afraid to act. Get the RINOs out, get Constitutionalists in, and lets give our posterity something we've saved. We wont have to say "the founders would have". We can say "We did".

1776/2020

More from Government

You May Also Like

One of the most successful stock trader with special focus on cash stocks and who has a very creative mind to look out for opportunities in dark times

Covering one of the most unique set ups: Extended moves & Reversal plays

Time for a 🧵 to learn the above from @iManasArora

What qualifies for an extended move?

30-40% move in just 5-6 days is one example of extended move

How Manas used this info to book


Post that the plight of the


Example 2: Booking profits when the stock is extended from 10WMA

10WMA =


Another hack to identify extended move in a stock:

Too many green days!

Read