The UK government's only strategy for some time - and this goes for everything, not just the pandemic - is leaking vague policy plans to trusted journos and letting the speculation outrage simmer to guage public reactions before committing to anything.

It happens so consistently that it simply must be be their core PR policy, and you just know they're very smug about how effective it is (note: it isn't).
This generation of Tories, as we've talked about before, have the concept of social engineering built into their ideology. It's their one guiding principle: you don't ever admit what you want, you just convince people they want it too.
It's all about manipulation and optics. It sort-of-kind-of worked with Brexit, in that it got them a result that brought them to power, but they've run up against the basic inertia of reality since.
As the wrestler Scott Steiner once put it in an interview, "You can't make chicken salad out of chicken shit."
With the pandemic it's totally derailing, because all people need to survive this is *good information*. And if you have, as Johnson and his ilk do, a compulsion to obfuscate, you just end up killing people.
You can see the wheels turning as they try to implement every policy change without ever saying why they're doing things. You can just about discern the *shape* of the situation they're trying to create...but it's not happening.
Because they have a fundamental belief that anyone who is Not One of Them is, for all intents and purposes, a mindless data point that exists to be smeared out into an average in a behavioural algorithm.
But it turns out we're actually people who talk to each other and remember things. We're not an amorphous GDP-producing mass of trending topics and voting intentions.
So when we get pushed and prodded into quasi-lockdowns with arbitrary rules that don't make sense, we don't respond uniformly, and the virus spreads. They want us to basically run like a clock they only have to wind up now and then.
They're addicted to this idea of just quietly pulling some levers in the background and then letting the whole system just run itself smoothly to their benefit. It's almost an aesthetic principle, a philosophical exercise, a demonstration of superior statecraft.
Just *telling us* what they want to happen feels inelegant. It's like how we'll put together an elaborate Excel formula that takes ages to figure out rather than just spend 5 minutes typing in numbers. It's mastery for its own sake.
And that's all very well but *people are dying*.

More from Government

Labour Grandees are listed in Sir Keir Starmer's colleague Jeffrey Epstein's ''Little Black Book''; Blair, Mandelson and Alastair Campbell. COINCIDENTLY, Keir Starmer and some of the same people have connections to ANOTHER of the worlds most prolific peadophiles. #StarmerOut


Starmer failed to bring charges against Jimmy Savile for paedophilia. The decision was made despite the Crown Prosecution Service receiving substantial evidence of his crimes from witnesses and victims several years before Savile died in 2011. #StarmerOut
https://t.co/PNyX5uSAkw


With a past like hers, Margaret Hodge might show a bit more humility.
In the Eighties Hodge was aware of previous child sex abuse in the care homes for which she was responsible, and did nothing about it. #LabourLeaks #StarmerOut

As leader of Islington Council, a post she held from 1982-92, Margaret Hodge was aware of previous, horrendous child sex abuse in the care homes for which she was responsible, and did nothing about it. #LabourLeaks #StarmerOut #CSA

She was guilty of rather more than a casual failure of oversight. In an open letter to the BBC after it investigated a range of monstrous abuse (child prostitution, torture, alleged murders), Hodge libelled one of its victims as “seriously disturbed”. #LabourLeaks #StarmerOut

You May Also Like

I’m torn on how to approach the idea of luck. I’m the first to admit that I am one of the luckiest people on the planet. To be born into a prosperous American family in 1960 with smart parents is to start life on third base. The odds against my very existence are astronomical.


I’ve always felt that the luckiest people I know had a talent for recognizing circumstances, not of their own making, that were conducive to a favorable outcome and their ability to quickly take advantage of them.

In other words, dumb luck was just that, it required no awareness on the person’s part, whereas “smart” luck involved awareness followed by action before the circumstances changed.

So, was I “lucky” to be born when I was—nothing I had any control over—and that I came of age just as huge databases and computers were advancing to the point where I could use those tools to write “What Works on Wall Street?” Absolutely.

Was I lucky to start my stock market investments near the peak of interest rates which allowed me to spend the majority of my adult life in a falling rate environment? Yup.