https://t.co/f8XgkfTERi
Yay I drawed a robot! pic.twitter.com/y0t2StGFvl
— The Second-Breakfast Club (@motherofgpigs) January 15, 2021
https://t.co/mODlYvTazz
Thought I\u2019d do a fluffy one! pic.twitter.com/Ic5rtQU7Ip
— RobTheRunt \U0001f331\u24cb (@robtherunt) January 15, 2021
https://t.co/4emSohWwCL
This was fun pic.twitter.com/jEWCK5qw1e
— Born in \U0001f1ea\U0001f1fa (@lukeocodes) January 15, 2021
https://t.co/uhgFxhdCcJ
— \U0001f3b2\U0001f3aeTan the HobbySquig\U0001f3a8\U0001f58c (@HobbySquig) January 15, 2021
https://t.co/P923eDCRnP
For you: pic.twitter.com/bKRLtpEe4r
— Rosewind (@Rosewind2007) January 15, 2021
https://t.co/GB49zJ59HU
I made a FlowerBot pic.twitter.com/b6TTYHBIPF
— Formally LibbyLights (@ElodieTheSquid) January 15, 2021
https://t.co/MUZpQy9Tij
I gave it some nice things. pic.twitter.com/VentNIZUAQ
— Dr. Harriet Brown \U0001f3f3\ufe0f\u200d\u26a7\ufe0f \U0001f3f3\ufe0f\u200d\U0001f308 (@Hattieinspace) January 15, 2021
https://t.co/ZTCxwKL6os
Decided to connect only the prime numbers. Dottobot Prime? pic.twitter.com/TVhtqIdO4n
— STICKBUG|A Single Spring Roll (@OtherConor) January 15, 2021
https://t.co/yhXJXaN1pB
Spikeybot. pic.twitter.com/ajSMrsJEjI
— Like Steve, but in 2021 (@StevenPape) January 15, 2021
https://t.co/OO7D7RFGHj
A neat version: pic.twitter.com/6bzVcvdAXs
— Rosewind (@Rosewind2007) January 15, 2021
https://t.co/2VMxRjvX3M
Thanks @smolrobots! That was fun \U0001f601 pic.twitter.com/VsvfNLaDqT
— Rita (@TheLadyStarfyre) January 15, 2021
https://t.co/tpafL9fhm0
I connected the dots pic.twitter.com/OGWVEVQ4wz
— \u2702Lemon Flavored Sunshine\U0001f34b (@RaeofSun95) January 15, 2021
https://t.co/j4NyS4UP6F
Pride \U0001f308 pic.twitter.com/M9LCVzNVE1
— Sadie (@ThatSadieBug) January 15, 2021
https://t.co/E66XFZkWwu
Oh no! Dottobot fell in the bag of yarn pic.twitter.com/XZKq8rMhIG
— Twisted Willow (@twistedwillow) January 15, 2021
https://t.co/0UPhzbVjcz
I got so close pic.twitter.com/XgCEtSbM6Y
— Tatra - Black Lives Matter (@TatraT815) January 15, 2021
https://t.co/33eGJYxDX1
Can we get a BigBot Dottobot? This one's a bit small for Fibonacci. pic.twitter.com/1pKevqRgfl
— Bram De Buyser (@chton) January 15, 2021
https://t.co/toG4sJSmJT
i used a random number generator to get the order of the dots
— Alex Chan (@alexwlchan) January 15, 2021
i think it\u2019s broken pic.twitter.com/oc0FCkAy3w
https://t.co/47x34uF2Uw
instructions unclear did it in steps of three instead pic.twitter.com/oPQF0Wuohp
— Dr. Alex Moylett \U0001f3f3\ufe0f\u200d\u26a7\ufe0f (@aemylt) January 15, 2021
https://t.co/YuHIjdqWdK
Have I done this right pic.twitter.com/ZcqwGXxEYF
— Pantonshire (@PantonshireDev) January 15, 2021
https://t.co/RfYpOGgALE
i used my spirograph, hope that's okay pic.twitter.com/MrzAqj4Lrp
— allison (@AlliGoetz) January 15, 2021
https://t.co/k1tUu0zjFu
It's all gone horribly wrong! pic.twitter.com/fCLY2uCcu8
— Myz Lilith (@MyzLilith) January 15, 2021
https://t.co/Z8lN7P8b7H
kept on missing the next dot and having to circle back around to get there pic.twitter.com/KeolvjmJVh
— Epidoomerologist Gritty 6'9" IQ 420 (@mumbly_joe) January 15, 2021
More from Fun
You May Also Like
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.

Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)

There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.

At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?