Jean-Louis Warnholz is Founding Principal and Managing Director of the BlackIvy Group. He worked in senior advisory positions for governments (UK, US), multilateral institutions (World Bank, UN) and private entities (Soros Economic Development Fund, S&P).
FOIA SOURCE LINK

https://t.co/JSpyeTtRDb
SOROS backed Clinton Staffer/Employee, Cheryl Mills and the Clintons recommended SMARTMATIC back in 2010 bc they held a "successful" election in the Philippines which was later discovered to be wrought with fraud and illegalities.
Five days before the elections, petitions were made to postpone the elections due to technical malfunctions with the electronic voting machines. The corrupt Supreme Court overrode these concerns.
A report by GFN 2010 Election Observers Team released on May 27 titled "Foreign Observers Challenge Election Legitimacy", presented arguments questioning the May 10, 2010 elections.
1. The Automated Election System (AES) was implemented without the appropriate field testing, and law-specified testing in actual elections.
2. The source code review was not completed and initial findings were not addressed.
3. No audit was done on the AES prior to the elections. There was only a mandated random manual audit which was not yet done at the time the report was written on May 27, 2010.
4. Several voter and security features were disabled prior to elections.
What we've just witnessed in the U.S. is straight out if a playbook, well designed and practiced. None of this happened by chance. They view you as property. They own you.

More from Fraud

19 December 2020 #MAGAanalysis #OVERTURN

The Signals Are Accelerating And Strengthening

I consider the tweet below the most important yet. We'll immediately discuss why below. After that there are two documents and an interview to work on. Clarity is arising, pointing the way.


2) I was about to laugh about the dispute warning, but then realized that this very act on Twitter's part is that grain of sand inside which you can see the entire world of what we face today. How dare they? How dare you Twitter? Who, WHAT do you think you are?


3) We have to consider the logic. Stave Navarro releases a report. It is published at Bannon's War Room. In these matters, tone is everything. It might have been published anywhere but the President, I mean Navarro, chose to publish with

4) That is a signal. Why Steve? Beyond the clear statement of unity - Steve is a full member of the strategic team working to save our nation - there is a far deeper, more important reason. Steve's main portfolio item is China. Choosing him speaks them as much as us. Maybe more.

5) Bullies are cowards. One of the greatest means of PREVENTING war is the bold, direct, aggressive communication of readiness. You want a piece of this? Come get it...expletives deleted. There's always the other hand. War may be coming.

You May Also Like

I like this heuristic, and have a few which are similar in intent to it:


Hiring efficiency:

How long does it take, measured from initial expression of interest through offer of employment signed, for a typical candidate cold inbounding to the company?

What is the *theoretical minimum* for *any* candidate?

How long does it take, as a developer newly hired at the company:

* To get a fully credentialed machine issued to you
* To get a fully functional development environment on that machine which could push code to production immediately
* To solo ship one material quanta of work

How long does it take, from first idea floated to "It's on the Internet", to create a piece of marketing collateral.

(For bonus points: break down by ambitiousness / form factor.)

How many people have to say yes to do something which is clearly worth doing which costs $5,000 / $15,000 / $250,000 and has never been done before.