You've found your way here, likely, through the process of digression and reincarnation (either literal or allegorical).

WTF is going on is the question for the ages--and--it's hotly debate, exactly "WTF is going on".

People with much to lose are sneaking and lying and paralleling the truth. You can learn more here:

https://t.co/DHf9IQLUYW

This was my 1st ever "interview on the internet". The man interviewing me has tragically passed away. Almost two years now probably. How sad.
So it's nearly impossible to discern just WTF is going on. They're tossing around huge military budgets just to manage such things.

I mean, here's a document from 2019, (22 pages), and it's alleging to explain how much is in the budget for 'counterintelligence programs'.
Here's the link, though I've not read it:

https://t.co/Eg10ogQqLg

Of course "counter-intelligence" is just a made up marketing word for "LIES".

So if they're budgeting in the billions, how in the HELL can we ever know WTF is going on?

And that's not the half of it!
AND if you DO figure out a tiny piece of WTF is going on, they'll attack you & troll you.(Using invisible robots of course). & they'll waste your time, & if you're not careful they'll ruin your reputation, especially if you talk of JEWS, which you're likely of course to do.
It would seem that JEWS have a BIG PART to play in "WTF is going on", or, perhaps they've used that BIG budget to just make it LOOK like Jews are involved. Yyou see how convoluted this gets? And now we're both anti-Semites--you and I--Because, I wrote about Jews, and you read it.
And perhaps it's not Jews, it's Jesuits. Or it's Freemasonry. Or it's the British Crown VS the Catholic Church. And this digression goes on and on.

IF you start listing people--and--you fail to mention the Illuminati, or the CFR, or the Council of 100, or Club of Rome, or...
The lesser known CNP, or maybe we need to add Saudi Royals, or very secret and powerful homosexuals... My god if you fail to list ALL of the possible players, then some well informed person on the internet will point our your flaws or omissions or your glaring bias, and now what?
I mean SERIOUSLY!? Now what. Do we try to address our biases or omissions? Do we accuse them of their own biases or omissions? Maybe we accuse them of being a SHILL?! Perhaps they ARE a shill, and they're actually an invisible robot just pretending to be a human on the internet.
Or maybe they're someone in an "asian" country, getting paid pennies a day to manage a whole bank of smart phones or computers, like these people we see in the photographs here on Google:
...and it goes WAY downhill from here man. I mean we can ask WTF is going on with more specify and it becomes a goddamned NIGHTMARE.

EXAMPLES:

✅WTF IS GOING ON W/ USA POLITICS
✅WTF IS GOING ON W/ COVID-19
✅WTF IS GOING ON W/ INDUSTRIAL FARMING
✅ "" "" "" W/ART
✅ "" "" "" W/ HYPERSEXUALIZATION OF CHILDREN
✅ "" "" "" W/ MEDIA PROGRAMMING
✅ "" "" "" W/ CENSORSHIP
✅ "" "" "" W/ THE WEATHER
✅"" "" "" W/ UFO'S/ALIENS
✅"" "" "" W/ THE CHRONOLOGY OF HISTORY
❓❓❓❓❓❓❓❓❓❓
We can do this endlessly.
(Seriously!)

I didn't even scratch the surface right?

...and where are we now? We've made it clear we know FAR LESS of 'WTF is going on' than we did when I 1st started trying to answer your question.

I do hope this helps!
🤷🤷🤷
ps

It looks like I might have been prompted to write this thread by a BOT!

...oh the IRONY!
😅😅😅

More from For later read

Nice to discover Judea Pearl ask a fundamental question. What's an 'inductive bias'?


I crucial step on the road towards AGI is a richer vocabulary for reasoning about inductive biases.

explores the apparent impedance mismatch between inductive biases and causal reasoning. But isn't the logical thinking required for good causal reasoning also not an inductive bias?

An inductive bias is what C.S. Peirce would call a habit. It is a habit of reasoning. Logical thinking is like a Platonic solid of the many kinds of heuristics that are discovered.

The kind of black and white logic that is found in digital computers is critical to the emergence of today's information economy. This of course is not the same logic that drives the general intelligence that lives in the same economy.

You May Also Like

A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.

Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.

6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices

https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x


PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.

735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices

https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ


The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.

The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.