YOUR and YOUR FAMILIES are SAFE
PROMISE
[MONDAY]
Next Week - BIGGER.
We LISTENED 20/80 />/40/60 (public vs anons >side edit)
Public awakening
CHECKMATE
Goodbye @ jack
READY FOR LAUNCH?
SHOW the WORLD.
SHOW the WORLD the TRUTH.
OPEN THEIR EYES
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
1.18
DOWN SHE GOES.
State of the union
DECLAS potus
SHOT HEARD AROUND THE WORLD
The_floor_is_yours_
THE BEGINNING OF THE END>
(D)ebbie (W)eisserman (S)chultz failed to flee
BHO in cover
Fight, fight, fight.
👉Demand public disclosure👈
> (Announcement without details🤔)
THE GREAT AWAKENING
++
++ / + TICK TOCK
Possible suicides?
1/19
Need a few red pills for family, friends, and others?
Read the # MEMO
NO DEALS
MSM contractors #goodbye#
Reiteration > Fight, Fight, Fight.
Remember THIS DAY
Why are Americans subsidizing Tesla?
The MEMO is ONLY THE BEGINNING>
THE SHOT HEARD AROUND THE WORLD.
1/20
Eisenhower warns of the US military complex
https://t.co/p8kz6TxEsd
1/21
THE MEMO
The STORM
NOBODY PLAYING THE GAME GETS A FREE PASS
SHOT HEAR AROUND THE WORLD
THE GREAT AWAKENING
A WEEK TO REMEMBER
The flood is coming
Emails, video, audio, pics, ect.
(N)o (S)uch (A)gency -accidently-😏 releases IT ALL>
What would happen if texts originating from a FBI agent to several [internals] discussed the assassination (possibility) of the POTUS or member of his family?
What if the texts suggest foreign allies were involved?
This is only the beginning.
60% must remain private[at least]
1/22
Castle Clean

More from For later read

Today's Twitter threads (a Twitter thread).

Inside: Planet Money on HP's myriad ripoffs; Strength in numbers; and more!

Archived at: https://t.co/esjoT3u5Gr

#Pluralistic

1/


On Feb 22, I'm delivering a keynote address for the NISO Plus conference, "The day of the comet: what trustbusting means for digital manipulation."

https://t.co/Z84xicXhGg

2/


Planet Money on HP's myriad ripoffs: Ink-stained wretches of the world, unite!

https://t.co/k5ASdVUrC2

3/


Strength in numbers: The crisis in accounting.

https://t.co/DjfAfHWpNN

4/


#15yrsago Bad Samaritan family won’t return found expensive camera https://t.co/Rn9E5R1gtV

#10yrsago What does Libyan revolution mean for https://t.co/Jz28qHVhrV? https://t.co/dN1e4MxU4r

5/
This response to my tweet is a common objection to targeted advertising.

@KevinCoates correct me if I'm wrong, but basic point seems to be that banning targeted ads will lower platform profits, but will mostly be beneficial for consumers.

Some counterpoints 👇


1) This assumes that consumers prefer contextual ads to targeted ones.

This does not seem self-evident to me


Research also finds that firms choose between ad. targeting vs. obtrusiveness 👇

If true, the right question is not whether consumers prefer contextual ads to targeted ones. But whether they prefer *more* contextual ads vs *fewer* targeted

2) True, many inframarginal platforms might simply shift to contextual ads.

But some might already be almost indifferent between direct & indirect monetization.

Hard to imagine that *none* of them will respond to reduced ad revenue with actual fees.

3) Policy debate seems to be moving from:

"Consumers are insufficiently informed to decide how they share their data."

To

"No one in their right mind would agree to highly targeted ads (e.g., those that mix data from multiple sources)."

IMO the latter statement is incorrect.

You May Also Like