Unofficial roll call of senators endorsing removal: (thread)

1. Blumenthal https://t.co/aVlevdnFVV
2. Booker
https://t.co/lsaHJIMJ2B
3. Brown
https://t.co/wmZYT3kN6d
4. Casey
https://t.co/0VLcwxARzA
5. Coons
https://t.co/oForNEhsl1
6. Durbin
https://t.co/kSBCVvFKMp
7. Hirono
https://t.co/Ox6OzYcAAu
8. Kaine
https://t.co/X7gSDwIniW
9. Leahy
https://t.co/JsWnRYoJ9u
10. Markey
https://t.co/3zUyxt9Vdj
11. Merkley
https://t.co/N329A38LKX
12. Murray
https://t.co/AHz4ca3UkO
13. Peters
https://t.co/M02LF7Adx2
14. Sanders
https://t.co/XGsDPkpTo7
15. Schatz
https://t.co/LMF2HFu0GM
17. Schumer
https://t.co/pXbkYTbOVk
18. Van Hollen
https://t.co/TlMZwYXdDP
19. Warner
https://t.co/hbJPryvK14
20. Warren
https://t.co/yuqO9u6h78
21. Whitehouse
https://t.co/hh7qIOMAeq
22. Wyden
https://t.co/lV3eumHDKH

More from For later read

This response to my tweet is a common objection to targeted advertising.

@KevinCoates correct me if I'm wrong, but basic point seems to be that banning targeted ads will lower platform profits, but will mostly be beneficial for consumers.

Some counterpoints 👇


1) This assumes that consumers prefer contextual ads to targeted ones.

This does not seem self-evident to me


Research also finds that firms choose between ad. targeting vs. obtrusiveness 👇

If true, the right question is not whether consumers prefer contextual ads to targeted ones. But whether they prefer *more* contextual ads vs *fewer* targeted

2) True, many inframarginal platforms might simply shift to contextual ads.

But some might already be almost indifferent between direct & indirect monetization.

Hard to imagine that *none* of them will respond to reduced ad revenue with actual fees.

3) Policy debate seems to be moving from:

"Consumers are insufficiently informed to decide how they share their data."

To

"No one in their right mind would agree to highly targeted ads (e.g., those that mix data from multiple sources)."

IMO the latter statement is incorrect.

You May Also Like

Trump is gonna let the Mueller investigation end all on it's own. It's obvious. All the hysteria of the past 2 weeks about his supposed impending firing of Mueller was a distraction. He was never going to fire Mueller and he's not going to


Mueller's officially end his investigation all on his own and he's gonna say he found no evidence of Trump campaign/Russian collusion during the 2016 election.

Democrats & DNC Media are going to LITERALLY have nothing coherent to say in response to that.

Mueller's team was 100% partisan.

That's why it's brilliant. NOBODY will be able to claim this team of partisan Democrats didn't go the EXTRA 20 MILES looking for ANY evidence they could find of Trump campaign/Russian collusion during the 2016 election

They looked high.

They looked low.

They looked underneath every rock, behind every tree, into every bush.

And they found...NOTHING.

Those saying Mueller will file obstruction charges against Trump: laughable.

What documents did Trump tell the Mueller team it couldn't have? What witnesses were withheld and never interviewed?

THERE WEREN'T ANY.

Mueller got full 100% cooperation as the record will show.