I think this is going back towards having pharmacists act as the police of a script without the tools necessary to do that
I see why they started it, but I worry it could cause a lot more harm then good.
There are instances where someone might get a script for a new pt from a new provider and have no background on either of them. That’s typically what it looks like with diversion
I think this is going back towards having pharmacists act as the police of a script without the tools necessary to do that
We are not, or at least not supposed to be. The idea that we are somehow to know that a patient is in pain or not (something subjective that we can’t see) and then if we give an Rx that wasn’t appropriate we can lose our license
It doesn’t make sense. Pharmacists are here to be there for patients and support them, yet this make them worry that they’re being duped
Prevents them from being able to properly listen and evaluate the patient and help them
But because of this undue pressure, they tend to get the least of any of those.
Why? Because of too much overreach putting immense pressure on providers to be gatekeepers and dea agents instead of just being pharmacists and physicians
But this is again supporting that overarching idea of gatekeeping meds which I don’t support.
We are there to ensure people are kept safe and treated properly, not gatekeep meds
I see the purpose it serves to fill, it’s not intended to just be slander for pain docs. It’s intentions I believe are good.
But I worry about it not being used as it is intended. It will likely hurt pain patients more that it helps others.
Pharmacists are investigators, we aren’t detectives. Others may want us to be, but we didn’t train for that
We were trained to keep people safe and healthy and treat their diseases or conditions
We can’t others agenda’s change that
More from For later read
Moderna's mRNA-1273 & Pfizer's BNT162b2 consist of mRNA 3821 nucleotides long encoding *all* 1273 amino acids of the Spike including a 2 Proline-stabilized RBD. This is a plain English Description of the code:
https://t.co/w7koHyMJjL
The article mentions a “10 nucleotide linker” (GCAUAUGACU) in the poly-A tail. This is described in the patent link below (Modification of RNA, producing an increased transcript stability and translation
Here is a link to the full mRNA code if you wish to download it, blast it or make up a batch in your garage
An overview of the encoded spike
Initial mouse
https://t.co/w7koHyMJjL
The article mentions a “10 nucleotide linker” (GCAUAUGACU) in the poly-A tail. This is described in the patent link below (Modification of RNA, producing an increased transcript stability and translation
Here is a link to the full mRNA code if you wish to download it, blast it or make up a batch in your garage
The mRNA sequences used for Moderna mRNA-1273 & Pfizer BNT162b2 mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 (Direct link in Word Format). WHO International Nonproprietary Name Program # 11889 "Messenger RNA encoding the full-length SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein"https://t.co/zTb7B0Apic pic.twitter.com/8tZxAZWI5S
— Roland Baker (@RolandBakerIII) December 24, 2020
An overview of the encoded spike
Moderna's mRNA-1273 & Pfizer's BNT162b2 consist of mRNA 3821 nucleotides long encoding *all* 1273 amino acids of the Spike including a 2 Proline-stabilized RBD and this includes the NTD (blue in monomer, dark gray in trimer attached to antibodies). AA 64, 66, 187, 213, 214 red. pic.twitter.com/4MX1ByAsrR
— Roland Baker (@RolandBakerIII) December 19, 2020
Initial mouse
News: NIH-Moderna investigational COVID-19 vaccine shows promise in mouse studies https://t.co/7JYuUyZT45
— NIH (@NIH) August 5, 2020