Since we’re talking about the King James Bible, I’ll just point out a few places where it’s clear how there’s always loss in translation. Like, if you’re only relying on the English there are things that just plain don’t make sense. But in the original? Lots clearer. 1/x Thread.

“And Adam called his wife's name Eve; because she was the mother of all living.”

I mean, what??

In the Hebrew her name is Hava /חוה because she is the mother of all living/haye/חי (and you need enough Hebrew to understand what the vavs and yuds are doing here).
“And he said, Thy name shall be called no more Jacob, but Israel: for as a prince hast thou power with God and with men, and hast prevailed.”

Again, this makes no sense and honestly is a bad translation, I know how they got “prince” but שרית should be “you have striven +
Or “contended” or “struggled” or “wrestled” with God /Elohim/aka the “El” suffix and the word for wrestled I didn’t transliterate, in the past tense it’s “sarita” so even if you don’t know conjugation you can already figure out how sr + el gets you close to Israel, yes?
None of this is clear in the KJV.

Or a third example.

“And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you... Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, The LORD God... +
hath sent me unto you: this is my name for ever, and this is my memorial unto all generations.”

Again, totally misses what’s happening here. First part: “And God said to Moses, “Ehyeh-Asher-Ehyeh.” He continued, “Thus shall you say to the Israelites, ‘Ehyeh sent me to you.”
It’s more “I will be” than “I am,” ok, that’s a quibble, but God is saying, tell the people that Being-Conjugated-In-The-First-Person sent me. But that would sound silly coming from Moses’ mouth. Moses says, “I Will Be sent me!” Just weird. So in the next verse...
God sort of catches Godself and gives Moses a different name to use. The Tetragrammaton. Translated in KJV as the LORD because Jews don’t say the holy Tetragrammaton, but rather “Adonai”, which you can translate as Lord, so ok. But the Tetragrammaton is a mashup of
Tenses of the verb “to be”. So God goes from saying “my name is I-will-be” to “my name is [pure being].” Moses has something clearer to tell the Israelites.

All this is lost in the KJV.
Of course, if you don’t know Hebrew you don’t know Hebrew. (You can learn!) But it’s important to just get that you’re, like, kissing through a veil, missing some nuances that are difficult to render or, sometimes, just rendered badly or not rendered. Be aware of the limitations.
For the record, my favorite English-based Torah-with-notes is The Torah: A Women’s Commentary (not just for women! Lots of great stuff and not even always gender focused, just brilliant women scholars who ALSO have good gender lenses), but Everett Fox’s translation +
Is also good (very literal, tries to capture the language) and Robert Alter’s is beautiful, poetic.
And of course if the KJV is your jam, keep rocking it! Not trying to dissuade anybody, just calling attention to some of the issues with translation.
Oh! And if you go to @SefariaProject, they have a bunch of translations online (click a verse and then find “versions”) so you can compare and contrast.
Ok great way to help you wrap your head around the Eve thing—“I’ll name you Livie because you’re the mother of all living” is kinda how it sounds.

That’s how a lot of the Torah wordplay goes. (Not all! But some!) https://t.co/efBBX6Ospw
Ok, and the good Rabbi Wolkenfeld has one to give you a sense of how Moses (well, Moshe) got his name. https://t.co/Ec1sxFoaTe
Another. There are so many. Isaac’s name (same root as the verb “to laugh”) is another. A lot of people’s names tbh. But also lots of other moments. https://t.co/61s9AagHO2
Like Yocheved in Exodus (2:1-2) looks at Moses & sees he is good--ki tov, the Hebrew says. Who else, after Creation, looks and sees ki tov? God, of course. (Gen 1:4 and etc.) We’re meant to hear that echo. Trampled in the KJV: “when she saw him that he was a goodly child.”
Also good for more historical-context commentary (as opposed to linguistic or mythical or spiritual or etc). The Jewish Study Bible and the Torah: A Women’s Commentary both use JPS as their base, which isn’t a disaster but is also not the absolute best, Dr. Eskenazi +
Oh whoops, meant to respond to this—anyway, in the Torah: A Women’s Commentary (need shorter name for that) Dr. Eskenazi tweaked the JPS in places but mostly what I like about it is the quality of the commentary.

I feel good about recommending all 4 of these tbh. https://t.co/L9dkHuMeFC

More from For later read

Hi @EdinburghUni @EHRC @EHRCChair @KishwerFalkner @RJHilsenrath @trussliz @GEOgovuk

The DIVERSITY INFORMATION section in yr job application mentions 'legal equality duties'. You then ask "What is your gender identity?" with options

Female
Male
Non-binary
Not-listed
Other

1/13


'Gender identity' is not a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010 and is not defined in the Act.

https://t.co/qisFhCiV1u

2/13


Sex is the protected characteristic and the only two possible options for sex are 'Female' and 'Male' as defined in the Act and consistent with biology - 'non-binary' and 'other' are not valid options.

https://t.co/CEJ0gkr6nF

'Gender identity' is not a synonym for sex.

3/13


You then ask "Does your gender identity match your sex registered at birth?"

4/13


Again, 'gender identity' is not a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010 and is not defined in the Act.

https://t.co/qisFhCiV1u

5/13
I’ve been frustrated by the tweets I’ve seen of this as a Canadian. Because the facts are being misrepresented.

We’re not under some sort of major persecution. That’s not what this is. A thread. 1/8


This church was fined for breaking health orders in Dec. They continued to break them. So the pastor was arrested and released on conditions of... you guessed it, not breaking health orders. And then they broke the health orders. 2/8

So then he was arrested and told he couldn’t hold church services in person if he was to be released. He refused. He’s still in custody.

Here is my frustration as a Christian in Canada:

1. They were able to gather, with some conditions. They didn’t like those. 3/8

2. He is not actually unable to preach. He is just unable to hold church services because they broke the conditions given by the public health office in Alberta. He says he can’t in good conscience do that, so they are keeping him in jail (because he will break the law). 4/8

3. This is the 1st article of The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: “guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.” 5/8

You May Also Like

So the cryptocurrency industry has basically two products, one which is relatively benign and doesn't have product market fit, and one which is malignant and does. The industry has a weird superposition of understanding this fact and (strategically?) not understanding it.


The benign product is sovereign programmable money, which is historically a niche interest of folks with a relatively clustered set of beliefs about the state, the literary merit of Snow Crash, and the utility of gold to the modern economy.

This product has narrow appeal and, accordingly, is worth about as much as everything else on a 486 sitting in someone's basement is worth.

The other product is investment scams, which have approximately the best product market fit of anything produced by humans. In no age, in no country, in no city, at no level of sophistication do people consistently say "Actually I would prefer not to get money for nothing."

This product needs the exchanges like they need oxygen, because the value of it is directly tied to having payment rails to move real currency into the ecosystem and some jurisdictional and regulatory legerdemain to stay one step ahead of the banhammer.