This is the ball-less-ness and spinelessness that has completely festered across our great land through years of complex information warfare campaigns.

The Preamble to the US Constitution is WE THE PEOPLE, it is a list of things the state CANNOT do.

But "public safety"

is determined by whom? We the people? Well that can't be accurate. Generally those recommendations come from the UN, the WHO, the CDC. Those bodies are funded internationally often from United States tax dollars; however, not with representation of the people.
So public safety rules are by definition the exact same concept that caused the American Revolution from the Boston Tea Party. There was British Royal Crown taxation on tea, despite the fact the royal crown had no claim to the new American colonies labor land or resources.
Public safety rules are being imposed by unelected, unaccountable new middle class. There is an ultra elite now that runs the worlds money supply, big pharma, big food, defense contracts, and money laundering operations, and then you have
The new middle class of deep state swamp protection that makes up Communist Party adherence and other useful idiots who are rewarded for believing all the propaganda and being the enforcers. The final class is everyone else. The people the plandemic was created for, the people
that the #bioweapon #vaccine was created for. All the talk we've heard about Universal Basic Income was not because the ultra rich elites love everyone and want to take care of them, they want dependence on the farm prior to slaughter.
UBI would require the Federal government to borrow untold trillions from Zionist bankers to give away with while nothing productive is created in this country and the wealth is exfiltrated to other nations. This is the future designed for us by public safety. This is the
future planned by the monopoly men who have been itching for depopulation since WWII and got caught. You can hear it in the Zeitgeist today. Think of how common it is to hear people accept the idea that mass sterilization is a good thing. That the population needs
to be managed, that if "we" (when really that means 'they') need to manage the population because it's getting so "out of control" with our food supply with fossil fuels with our environmental damage, etc. but who is pushing this messaging?
The food supply is a problem? Says who? Bill Gates? The guy who has his wealth tied up in GMO food companies and are creating national security issues for countries around the world by having seeds that can't be regrown?
Fossil fuels are a problem? Is that from the Rothschilds who originally amassed their wealth from the oil industry and now they are losing their dominance on the monopoly they would like to regulate competition out of existence?
And environmental damage? Who is damaging the environment? Isn't the legal structure of a corporation preventing individuals from being personally responsible for the damages they cause to land and other externalities? All of these things are globalist created problems, yet
We hear we need "global solutions" we need "public health" we need "less dangerous freedom"

It's time to #FightBack
It's time a new American Revolution
It's time for a new Boston Tea Party where we realize the people making these public safety rules do not represent
#wethepeople or our interests. The sooner we realize that social distancing is social conditioning to prevent us from decentralizing and creating our own economies outside of the existing monopoly structure the more powerful we will become. We have the tools. It's on us to do it.

More from For later read

I’ve been frustrated by the tweets I’ve seen of this as a Canadian. Because the facts are being misrepresented.

We’re not under some sort of major persecution. That’s not what this is. A thread. 1/8


This church was fined for breaking health orders in Dec. They continued to break them. So the pastor was arrested and released on conditions of... you guessed it, not breaking health orders. And then they broke the health orders. 2/8

So then he was arrested and told he couldn’t hold church services in person if he was to be released. He refused. He’s still in custody.

Here is my frustration as a Christian in Canada:

1. They were able to gather, with some conditions. They didn’t like those. 3/8

2. He is not actually unable to preach. He is just unable to hold church services because they broke the conditions given by the public health office in Alberta. He says he can’t in good conscience do that, so they are keeping him in jail (because he will break the law). 4/8

3. This is the 1st article of The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: “guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.” 5/8
I should mention, this is why I keep talking about this. Because I know so many people who legally CAN'T.

How do I know they have NDAs, if they can't talk legally about them? Because they trusted me with their secrets... after I said something. That's how they knew I was safe.


Some of the people who have reached out to me privately have been sitting with the pain of what happened to them and the regret that they signed for YEARS. But at the time, it didn't seem like they had any other option BUT to sign.

I do not blame *anyone* for signing an NDA, especially when it's attached to a financial lifeline. When you feel like your family's wellbeing is at stake, you'll do anything -- even sign away your own voice -- to provide for them. That's not a "choice"; that's survival.

And yes, many of the people whose stories I now know were pressured into signing an NDA by my husband's ex-employer. Some of whom I *never* would have guessed. People I thought "left well." Turns out, they've just been *very* good at abiding by the terms of their NDA.

(And others who have reached out had similar experiences with other Christian orgs. Turns out abuse, and the use of NDAs to cover up that abuse, is rampant in a LOT of places.)

You May Also Like

The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.


In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.

In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.

This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.

In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.