This is the ball-less-ness and spinelessness that has completely festered across our great land through years of complex information warfare campaigns.

The Preamble to the US Constitution is WE THE PEOPLE, it is a list of things the state CANNOT do.

But "public safety"

is determined by whom? We the people? Well that can't be accurate. Generally those recommendations come from the UN, the WHO, the CDC. Those bodies are funded internationally often from United States tax dollars; however, not with representation of the people.
So public safety rules are by definition the exact same concept that caused the American Revolution from the Boston Tea Party. There was British Royal Crown taxation on tea, despite the fact the royal crown had no claim to the new American colonies labor land or resources.
Public safety rules are being imposed by unelected, unaccountable new middle class. There is an ultra elite now that runs the worlds money supply, big pharma, big food, defense contracts, and money laundering operations, and then you have
The new middle class of deep state swamp protection that makes up Communist Party adherence and other useful idiots who are rewarded for believing all the propaganda and being the enforcers. The final class is everyone else. The people the plandemic was created for, the people
that the #bioweapon #vaccine was created for. All the talk we've heard about Universal Basic Income was not because the ultra rich elites love everyone and want to take care of them, they want dependence on the farm prior to slaughter.
UBI would require the Federal government to borrow untold trillions from Zionist bankers to give away with while nothing productive is created in this country and the wealth is exfiltrated to other nations. This is the future designed for us by public safety. This is the
future planned by the monopoly men who have been itching for depopulation since WWII and got caught. You can hear it in the Zeitgeist today. Think of how common it is to hear people accept the idea that mass sterilization is a good thing. That the population needs
to be managed, that if "we" (when really that means 'they') need to manage the population because it's getting so "out of control" with our food supply with fossil fuels with our environmental damage, etc. but who is pushing this messaging?
The food supply is a problem? Says who? Bill Gates? The guy who has his wealth tied up in GMO food companies and are creating national security issues for countries around the world by having seeds that can't be regrown?
Fossil fuels are a problem? Is that from the Rothschilds who originally amassed their wealth from the oil industry and now they are losing their dominance on the monopoly they would like to regulate competition out of existence?
And environmental damage? Who is damaging the environment? Isn't the legal structure of a corporation preventing individuals from being personally responsible for the damages they cause to land and other externalities? All of these things are globalist created problems, yet
We hear we need "global solutions" we need "public health" we need "less dangerous freedom"

It's time to #FightBack
It's time a new American Revolution
It's time for a new Boston Tea Party where we realize the people making these public safety rules do not represent
#wethepeople or our interests. The sooner we realize that social distancing is social conditioning to prevent us from decentralizing and creating our own economies outside of the existing monopoly structure the more powerful we will become. We have the tools. It's on us to do it.

More from For later read

This response to my tweet is a common objection to targeted advertising.

@KevinCoates correct me if I'm wrong, but basic point seems to be that banning targeted ads will lower platform profits, but will mostly be beneficial for consumers.

Some counterpoints 👇


1) This assumes that consumers prefer contextual ads to targeted ones.

This does not seem self-evident to me


Research also finds that firms choose between ad. targeting vs. obtrusiveness 👇

If true, the right question is not whether consumers prefer contextual ads to targeted ones. But whether they prefer *more* contextual ads vs *fewer* targeted

2) True, many inframarginal platforms might simply shift to contextual ads.

But some might already be almost indifferent between direct & indirect monetization.

Hard to imagine that *none* of them will respond to reduced ad revenue with actual fees.

3) Policy debate seems to be moving from:

"Consumers are insufficiently informed to decide how they share their data."

To

"No one in their right mind would agree to highly targeted ads (e.g., those that mix data from multiple sources)."

IMO the latter statement is incorrect.

You May Also Like

Fake chats claiming to be from the Irish African community are being disseminated by the far right in order to suggest that violence is imminent from #BLM supporters. This is straight out of the QAnon and Proud Boys playbook. Spread the word. Protest safely. #georgenkencho


There is co-ordination across the far right in Ireland now to stir both left and right in the hopes of creating a race war. Think critically! Fascists see the tragic killing of #georgenkencho, the grief of his community and pending investigation as a flashpoint for action.


Across Telegram, Twitter and Facebook disinformation is being peddled on the back of these tragic events. From false photographs to the tactics ofwhite supremacy, the far right is clumsily trying to drive hate against minority groups and figureheads.


Declan Ganley’s Burkean group and the incel wing of National Party (Gearóid Murphy, Mick O’Keeffe & Co.) as well as all the usuals are concerted in their efforts to demonstrate their white supremacist cred. The quiet parts are today being said out loud.


The best thing you can do is challenge disinformation and report posts where engagement isn’t appropriate. Many of these are blatantly racist posts designed to drive recruitment to NP and other Nationalist groups. By all means protest but stay safe.