Today, I picked up my final paycheck from Colorado Community Media. I am going to miss working with the company’s outstanding roster of journalists. I want to thank CCM for the opportunity it has provided me.

I was let go Friday, Jan. 22, following a series of events…(1/21)

(2/21) In short, I was fired following my reluctance to sign a document agreeing to punishments placed upon me. They included: limiting my social media use to only share CCM stories/reach out to sources and…
(3/21)…Requiring me to receive approval from my editor to reach out to a source more than 3 times. (More on that later). I was able to slightly negotiate out words like “harassment” and “personal agenda,” however the list of reprimands themselves seemed non-negotiable.
(4/21) My publisher told me I had two options: Sign the document or resign. He had previously agreed to let me turn the document in on Monday (today). On Friday, I said I would consider signing the document on Monday.

I was fired that afternoon.
(5/21) I was willing to sign the disciplinary document, despite my disagreements, with the condition that my company show support for me, on my behalf, in a battle for information I had with the Town of Parker. They refused.
(6/21) The disciplinary document CCM wanted me to sign followed actions I had made on social media Friday morning. I tweeted 3 screenshots of email/text conversations I had with Parker officials and Mayor Jeff Toborg.
(7/21) My intention was to report my difficulties getting in direct contact with Mayor Toborg for the past 15 days. Toborg had gone silent—not returning phone calls or text messages—following a Jan. 10 incident where he allegedly posted controversial material on social media.
(8/21) Per my editor’s request, I deleted the tweets of the screenshot conversations roughly three hours after posting.
The screenshots included the town’s email to set up a phone call with the mayor next week (this week)…
(9/21) another one included a town email saying the mayor does not have to talk to me if I continued to act “unprofessionally.” This was in response to my refusal to give them preliminary questions for an interview with the mayor.
(10/21) Upon receiving a bounce-back email that the communications director was out of the office until next week, I tweeted that the communications director was on vacation. The comms director engaged from their personal profile to clarify their point, and I retweeted.
(11/21) My editor and publisher said I intended to use the platform to embarrass/shame the public officials as a means to get them to return my call. I felt I had exhausted all other avenues and, after two weeks of nothing, I was justified in my actions.
(12/21) I understand what I did embarrassed the people involved. I am not a vengeful reporter. I am deeply sorry to those who were offended. However, I do not feel my actions warranted such a damning reprimand upon myself.
(13/21) The document included aspects of my job that had nothing to do w/ the incident, including meeting my story quota and limiting errors in my stories.
(14/21) I had trouble w/ productivity in the past and accepted reprimands accordingly. I had long since remedied those problems, I felt. They were in no way related to the current problem I had with the town.
(15/21) The list of punishments included things like limiting misspellings, grammar mistakes and other aspects I felt were my editor’s responsibility to check.
CCM let me go to preserve its relationship with the town’s communications dept.
(16/21) I regret the way my time with CCM ended. I stand by refusal to sign the disciplinary document against me.

Now time for the feelings…
(17/21) In hindsight, maybe it was better to accept the resignation. However, I truly love the reporters I worked alongside and the people I touched with my work and I did not want to quit. I was conflicted.
(18/21) Moreover, I felt proud to contribute to a company that launched my career as a journalist.
I feel betrayed by my editor and publisher, who did not offer support for me in this conflict I had with the town.
(19/21) I feel awful to have let my coworkers down, as well as my readers in Parker, Lone Tree and throughout Douglas County.
(20/21) That is pretty much it. Of course, like anything, there is so much context to this situation that I cannot possibly communicate through Twitter. I hope this answered some questions people had about my sudden departure.
(21/21) I plan on continuing my career as a journalist as soon as possible. I have a full heart, clear head and the same passion for reporting that I did three days ago.
Thank you to everyone for the support I have received. I am not done fighting.

-30-

More from For later read

Ester Ranzen/ Childline/BBC/Saville/Mandelson 👀👇


1. 'MYSTERIOUS ESTHER RANTZEN' ..2017
https://t.co/aBsJL2Avqd


2. (Let's This Party Started) Keith Vaz and Ester Ranzen.


3. 'BBC'S ESTHER RANTZEN LINKED TO ELM GUEST HOUSE' https://t.co/a064KgW8LJ


4. Esther Rantzen is quizzed about Jimmy Savile - 2012
Today's Twitter threads (a Twitter thread).

Inside: Planet Money on HP's myriad ripoffs; Strength in numbers; and more!

Archived at: https://t.co/esjoT3u5Gr

#Pluralistic

1/


On Feb 22, I'm delivering a keynote address for the NISO Plus conference, "The day of the comet: what trustbusting means for digital manipulation."

https://t.co/Z84xicXhGg

2/


Planet Money on HP's myriad ripoffs: Ink-stained wretches of the world, unite!

https://t.co/k5ASdVUrC2

3/


Strength in numbers: The crisis in accounting.

https://t.co/DjfAfHWpNN

4/


#15yrsago Bad Samaritan family won’t return found expensive camera https://t.co/Rn9E5R1gtV

#10yrsago What does Libyan revolution mean for https://t.co/Jz28qHVhrV? https://t.co/dN1e4MxU4r

5/

You May Also Like

1/12

RT-PCR corona (test) scam

Symptomatic people are tested for one and only one respiratory virus. This means that other acute respiratory infections are reclassified as


2/12

It is tested exquisitely with a hypersensitive non-specific RT-PCR test / Ct >35 (>30 is nonsense, >35 is madness), without considering Ct and clinical context. This means that more acute respiratory infections are reclassified as


3/12

The Drosten RT-PCR test is fabricated in a way that each country and laboratory perform it differently at too high Ct and that the high rate of false positives increases massively due to cross-reaction with other (corona) viruses in the "flu


4/12

Even asymptomatic, previously called healthy, people are tested (en masse) in this way, although there is no epidemiologically relevant asymptomatic transmission. This means that even healthy people are declared as COVID


5/12

Deaths within 28 days after a positive RT-PCR test from whatever cause are designated as deaths WITH COVID. This means that other causes of death are reclassified as
@franciscodeasis https://t.co/OuQaBRFPu7
Unfortunately the "This work includes the identification of viral sequences in bat samples, and has resulted in the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines." were BEFORE the


chimeric infectious clone grants were there.https://t.co/DAArwFkz6v is in 2017, Rs4231.
https://t.co/UgXygDjYbW is in 2016, RsSHC014 and RsWIV16.
https://t.co/krO69CsJ94 is in 2013, RsWIV1. notice that this is before the beginning of the project

starting in 2016. Also remember that they told about only 3 isolates/live viruses. RsSHC014 is a live infectious clone that is just as alive as those other "Isolates".

P.D. somehow is able to use funds that he have yet recieved yet, and send results and sequences from late 2019 back in time into 2015,2013 and 2016!

https://t.co/4wC7k1Lh54 Ref 3: Why ALL your pangolin samples were PCR negative? to avoid deep sequencing and accidentally reveal Paguma Larvata and Oryctolagus Cuniculus?