So you're a freelance marketer, designer, coach, growth hacker etc thinking about building your business in 2021. VC platform teams can be your ace in the hole.

We need you! We love you! We can be a great stream of biz ... IF you know how to pitch us.

Here's my advice:

PSA: if you don't know, VC platform teams are the (usually) non-investing professionals who support portfolio companies in functional areas.

@upfrontvc has a Head of Talent, a Head of Legal, and a Head of Marketing (me!) We're all former senior operators in startups.
As individuals we can't *do* the work for ~ 100 active companies, but we *can* reco resources to teams who may not have the experience, and definitely don't have time, to find them.

I look for fit in functional skills, category, pricing & chemistry. One size does not fit all.
So! Cold pitches work! But not like this: "I'm a freelance graphic designer, here's my book, please consider me, good day."

Problem is now I have to work to figure out if/where you would fit & I couldn't meet with everyone even if I wanted to.

A better 1st pitch:
1. Give me a functional/skills scope. Instead of "I'm a comms consultant" (generic) tell me "I'm a comms consultant who works with startups on messaging, media training and media relations."

Or: "I'm a growth consultant w/ a core focus on paid Facebook & Instagram campaigns."
2. Next: any category expertise/interest.

"Visual designer with experience in UI/UX, brand identity, and graphic design, particularly in ecomm businesses."

"Content strategist w/ experience in B2B businesses, esp fintech and health tech"

Even: "interest in women founded biz"
Of course include proof:
- Website/book
- Content samples
- Clients you've worked with, esp other startups
- Your background or past jobs (e.g. you worked at a big SaaS company and now you're consulting on SaaS)

A LinkedIn is good but usually not sufficient.
With all of this, now I know who you are, what you're great at, who you've worked with and where you might make sense in the portfolio. Personally, I'm much more likely to have a quick call to learn more about you (personal chemistry, pricing, etc.)
I know it can seem counterintuitive to narrow your scope but IMO the more focus, the better. Anyone who tells me they "do it all" - that might be true, but it's generic.

I LOVE someone who says "here's what I'm great at, here's what I don't do." Help me help you!
Lastly, I would try to find an email or (even better but not required) a warm intro. IMO LinkedIn messages are too easy to miss amidst all the unrelated spam (seriously, I feel like I'm about to get LinkedIn mail from that Christmas onesie.)

More from Entrepreneurship

You May Also Like

Funny, before the election I recall lefties muttering the caravan must have been a Trump setup because it made the open borders crowd look so bad. Why would the pro-migrant crowd engineer a crisis that played into Trump's hands? THIS is why. THESE are the "optics" they wanted.


This media manipulation effort was inspired by the success of the "kids in cages" freakout, a 100% Stalinist propaganda drive that required people to forget about Obama putting migrant children in cells. It worked, so now they want pics of Trump "gassing children on the border."

There's a heavy air of Pallywood around the whole thing as well. If the Palestinians can stage huge theatrical performances of victimhood with the willing cooperation of Western media, why shouldn't the migrant caravan organizers expect the same?

It's business as usual for Anarchy, Inc. - the worldwide shredding of national sovereignty to increase the power of transnational organizations and left-wing ideology. Many in the media are true believers. Others just cannot resist the narrative of "change" and "social justice."

The product sold by Anarchy, Inc. is victimhood. It always boils down to the same formula: once the existing order can be painted as oppressors and children as their victims, chaos wins and order loses. Look at the lefties shrieking in unison about "Trump gassing children" today.
So the cryptocurrency industry has basically two products, one which is relatively benign and doesn't have product market fit, and one which is malignant and does. The industry has a weird superposition of understanding this fact and (strategically?) not understanding it.


The benign product is sovereign programmable money, which is historically a niche interest of folks with a relatively clustered set of beliefs about the state, the literary merit of Snow Crash, and the utility of gold to the modern economy.

This product has narrow appeal and, accordingly, is worth about as much as everything else on a 486 sitting in someone's basement is worth.

The other product is investment scams, which have approximately the best product market fit of anything produced by humans. In no age, in no country, in no city, at no level of sophistication do people consistently say "Actually I would prefer not to get money for nothing."

This product needs the exchanges like they need oxygen, because the value of it is directly tied to having payment rails to move real currency into the ecosystem and some jurisdictional and regulatory legerdemain to stay one step ahead of the banhammer.