Authors, you deserve an agent who…

Replies to your emails in a timely fashion, and lets you know when they won’t be able to.
(1/13)

Reads your manuscripts, revisions, outlines, and other materials in a timely fashion, provides an EDA when needed, and lets you know if a delay occurs.
(2/13)
Communicates in a way that works for YOU, be that email, texting, or phone, and is open FROM THE CALL STAGE about any forms of communication they are unable or unwilling to use.
(3/13)
Understands and respects YOUR publishing goals, and is upfront and honest about how realistic they are.
(4/13)
Respects your decision to turn down any offer, for any reason, and to hold out for YOUR minimum requirements for taking an offer.
(5/13)
Forwards ALL rejections if you ask for all rejections, and forwards NONE if you ask for none. The agent does not get to dictate which will hurt you more.
(6/13)
Asks for your input on the sub list and IMMEDIATELY REMOVES any publishers you are not enthusiastic about (after a conversation about why the agent wants to include them if necessary).
(7/13)
Provides editorial advice or brainstorming when needed and admits when they are no longer able to see a concrete editorial path or publication path for a specific MS.
(8/13)
Calls you by the name you call yourself and asks if you mind if they want to call you something else. Respects you if you say no.
(9/13)
Sets up phone calls with the editors who make offers on your book if you request it—especially if you have multiple offers.
(10/13)
Does their best not to give you false hope. (This is a tough one… I know agents are hoping for good deals too and this likely isn’t intentional.)
(11/13)
Tells you as soon as they know they do not want to rep a new project, so you can decide whether to find a new agent or change gears.
(12/13)
Parts ways clearly and in writing as soon as they know they no longer want to work with you. It’s tough to end a relationship, even a professional one. But letting a bad one drag out hurts more.
(13/13, see note below)
Authors, please feel free to add to this if you like. I never actually got past the “getting an offer” phase to the “signing a publishing contract” phase, but I’m sure there are things beyond that too. ❤️
(Please note that these are based on my experience with multiple agents and other experiences I have heard about and do not refer to any one specific agent.)

More from Culture

You May Also Like

Master Thread of all my threads!

Hello!! 👋

• I have curated some of the best tweets from the best traders we know of.

• Making one master thread and will keep posting all my threads under this.

• Go through this for super learning/value totally free of cost! 😃

1. 7 FREE OPTION TRADING COURSES FOR


2. THE ABSOLUTE BEST 15 SCANNERS EXPERTS ARE USING

Got these scanners from the following accounts:

1. @Pathik_Trader
2. @sanjufunda
3. @sanstocktrader
4. @SouravSenguptaI
5. @Rishikesh_ADX


3. 12 TRADING SETUPS which experts are using.

These setups I found from the following 4 accounts:

1. @Pathik_Trader
2. @sourabhsiso19
3. @ITRADE191
4.


4. Curated tweets on HOW TO SELL STRADDLES.

Everything covered in this thread.
1. Management
2. How to initiate
3. When to exit straddles
4. Examples
5. Videos on
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.


In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.

In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.

This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.

In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.