$DEBASE - A Composable/Modular Algorithmic Stable Coin Protocol

https://t.co/v3383S9VsP
https://t.co/mAul2JSyWE

A guest post, written by the Debase community.

2/

Algorithmic stable coin protocols & in particular elastic supply tokens (e.g. AMPL, Base) have emerged as contenders for decentralized price-stable assets. The premise of such tokens is to convert price-volatility into supply-volatility, in search of a price peg (e.g. 1 USD)
3/

The idea is that at sufficiently large market capitalisations supply-volatility will taper off and you are left with a price-stable asset. So far this has not been the case
4/

Projects like Ampleforth continue to experience sustained price and supply volatility even as market capitalisation has ballooned. Subsequent iterations have tried to improve on this model by modifying one or more of the static parameters; BASE, RMPL etc., come to mind
5/

While the subsequent iterations modified a fixed set of ‘flexible’ parameters, the fundamental mechanism of elastic supply tokens remains static. Debase is the first elastic supply token to introduce completely dynamic parameters (16+).
6/

Debase is the most dynamic algorithmic stable coin:

1. A composable and modular protocol
2. Infinite iteration and experimentation, virtually any DeFi composition is possible, mediated through Debase’s in-built gov. layer
3. Over 16 dynamic parameters
7/

4. Composability w/ a wide range of DeFi elements appeals to the full spectrum of stakeholders in the DeFi ecosystem, including but not limited to yield farmers, options traders, other stable coins/DeFi projects who can build "stabilizer pools".
5. Stabilizer pools (s-pools)
8/

S-pools act as plugins that add additional logic/function, to stabilize $DEBASE, to the core protocol. Ecosystem participants are incentivized to coordinate & ensure Debase gravitates to a peg. It is only limited by smart contract capability & what governance permits
9/

Given the infinitely modular nature of Debase, It can absorb innovative new ideas in its stride as it evolves and matures. S-pools with various, unique strategies will sit on a spectrum of passive to active designs
10/

Passive S-pools:
These do not have an active agent of stabilization, and rely on pure game theory to stabilize supply (and therefore price).

For example, a S-pool that rewards stakers with $DEBASE if there are less than 'n' number of negative rebases over m time periods
11/

Active S-pools:
These have an active agent of stabilization, for example a S-pool that acts as a yield vault. This vault may take $DEBASE/DAI LP tokens or assets as capital, use a yield farming strategy and set aside part of the profits to peg $DEBASE to its target price
12/

S-pools will exist on a spectrum between the two extreme types of pools (active and passive).

Debase needs to attract as many diverse strategists as possible - to this end it is already working on onboarding these stakeholders to governance e.g. 88MPH - governance partner.
13/

How can all the active/passive S-pools coordinate to stabilise $DEBASE, despite their varied interests? Aligned incentives. Debase’s incentive structure enables governance ($DEGOV) to share protocol profits in DAI/other assets in treasury when $DEBASE is stable
14/

Governance plays an important role in growth & stabilization. Because governance can be rewarded for driving utility, governance partners are incentivised to ulitilize Debase as a stable reserve. Large DeFi protocols, once onboarded to governance, can push for stable utility
15/

For instance, wrapped $DEBASE when it is largely stable with a small tx fee on every transaction that goes to s-pool rewards fund controlled by governance. Large DeFi protocols, once onboarded, would be incentivised to push $DEBASE as a DeFi stable reserve currency.
16/

Debase rebases from launch

More from Crypto

🚨Altcoin Trading Indicator🚨

How to use it. A THREAD.

Please Share.

To use it to buy Altcoins and make a high probability entry, the following conditions needs to be fulfilled.

For a long.
1. A green candle Closes above the cross.
2. Heikin Ashi candle turns green.
3. Price should be above 0.236 Fib from the swing high.


How to add the Indicator.

1. Click on the link and Add it to favorites and apply.
https://t.co/Kn90qgDjMi

2. Or Search it in the tab and then apply it.


The indicator itself the most comprehensive Moving Average Indicator which provides 9 MAs and 13 Different times of MAs.

The base of the indicator was by @insiliconot.

To further enhance it, I have added a cross indicator on the cross which works the best historically on Alts.


Condition 1- The cross.

Entry is made when a Cross occurs on the EMA 13/21.
The indicator automatically indicators the Cross with P for a positive cross or N for a negative cross.

This is the first condition for an Entry.
2020 was a game changer for Ethereum.

The vast majority of its success was fueled by #DeFi.

Here's what happened in 5 Tweets 🔽

1) Governance Tokens 🪙

Projects gave complete ownership of billion dollar protocols to their users, often using retroactive airdrops.

Early adopters earned tokens for past usage, and token-based voting now dictates all technical


2) Liquidity Mining ⛏️

Power users were the first to earn on-going distribution by providing liquidity.

$COMP sparked the wave, with $BAL coining the term a few weeks


3) Yield Faming 🌾

Projects coupled liquidity mining and governance tokens to boost 'yields' by combining lending rates with an incentive layer.

APYs peaked as high as 1M% during 'DeFi summer', leading to a 'food coin' craze like $YAM and


4) Fair Launches ✅

Who needs investment when you can launch using yield farming?

@iearnfinance debuted $YFI with no formal funding, seeding a community treasury for self-sustainability.

The notion of a core team and community became one and the

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?